Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 125
Page 1 of 13

« Previous | Next »

Federal Workforce is "Elite Island of Secure and High-Paid Workers"

Federal Workforce is "Elite Island of Secure and High-Paid Workers"

Automative assistant
VA
Thu May 18, 2006 8:58 AM

Post Reply

I'm an employee in the Federal workforce, and have 39 years of service, and as of yet, do not make an income of $40,000. So, if the average is $100,000. I'm not included in the average. In fact, I need a raise.

elite and overpaid

HR
DoD
Thu May 18, 2006 9:00 AM

Post Reply

When high-school educated people working on an assembly line can make over $100,000 I don't want to hear about the overpaid, elite federal workforce that mostly doesn't make huge amounts of money and does such unimportant tasks as monitoring food, air, water quality; providing national defense and security; law enforcement, courts, prisons; health and welfare services; and a myriad other things that benefit this country. How much does the think-tank wonk who wrote this drivel make for cranking out uninformed papers?

average salary

HR Specialist
Interior
Thu May 18, 2006 9:00 AM

Post Reply

The $100,000 figure is an average that includes the value of wages and benefits, such as retirement. The dollar average (wages only) is just under $67,000. It obviously doesn't mean every federal employee will make that much as many are higher and many are lower.

Re: average salary

Training Specialist
Dod
Fri May 19, 2006 1:53 AM
I wonder what the numbers would look like if you took out air traffic controllers (who have no private sector equivalent), law enforcement (w/mandatory retirement), etc.

I'm really curious about the so called "compensation". 100,178 minus 66558 means that there are 33,620 dollars of "fringe benefits" in there somewhere. Am I missing something? My pay is about 54K, so adjusting the numbers I should be getting about 16-17K in benefits. Now just where are they? I'd like to know.

The fact (as stated by the report) that 40 percent of companies don't even have retirement plans...that's a problem with the new Corporate America...not Federal Government.

Elite Island?

financial analyst
FSA
Thu May 18, 2006 9:06 AM

Post Reply

Yes, unfortunately it has become that> New hires no longer wait a few years between grades, they shoot right up the career ladder and are soon making the same grade level as thrity year employees. Sorry. Nobody can tell me that a kid out of college, 27 years old, should be a GS-12 in a matter of a couple years. No way do they have the acumen, the background, the experience to be a gs-12. This kind of crap is dragging down the federal workforce and makingus look like we are an elite group. Time to slow down the Grade Creep!

Re: Elite Island?

Antiterrorism/Security Specialist
DoD
Thu May 18, 2006 11:54 AM
Change is the hardest thing for anybody to deal with, especially employees who have been around the longest. The implication that everybody should be hired at low levels and slowly rise through the ranks to their target grade(GS12 in this case) is not logical in a world where people can easily find outside employment paying much more money. Your organization will be left with the least desireable employees if they choose to slow down individual pay raises based soley on time-in-service. I imagine it can be quite embarrassing for a senior person to see a "new" person come in at a similar pay grade, have knowledge in the field of work, and loads more ambition. Just as you can't assume somebody with 20+ years service has substantial knowledge/experience, you also can't assume that the "new" person brings less to the table than you. I have seen people with 20+ years in my career field who know very little about their job. I am the "new" guy they call whenever they have questions.

Re: Elite Island?

FLM
USDA
Fri May 19, 2006 3:48 PM
Antiterrorism expert - are you implying that only younger employees are equipped with ambition? At what age are you going to lose yours if ambition is reserved for only "new" employees.

Re: Elite Island?

PS
US DOL
Tue May 23, 2006 10:30 AM
And I am the old gal (33 yrs of service) who gets all the work because they don't want to give it to the new guys to screw up. The new guys can meanwhile surf the net and get 1 to every 6-7 cases I get. Fair? Elite? not even close.

Statistics

Management Analyst
USDOJ
Thu May 18, 2006 9:06 AM

Post Reply

Did someone once say, "There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics?"

Re: Statistics

American
Federal Government
Thu May 18, 2006 9:55 AM
That was Mark Twain.

Pay

Accounting Tech
DFAS
Thu May 18, 2006 9:09 AM

Post Reply

The average employee here is a GS-7, considerably below all figures cited. All those highly paid employees must be at another agency. I'm happy with my job, but my pay, while I feel it's fair, is nowhere near what this libertarian idiot thinks it is.

Why are libertarians always employed at subsidized "think tanks"? Can't any of them hold down jobs in the real world?

Re: Pay

Senior Attorney
Social Security Administration
Thu May 18, 2006 3:02 PM
What makes you think people of any particular political persuasion can't hold a real job? Your bias is showing. I am a libertarian, and working for 35 years within the goverment to witness its dysfunction first hand has made me so. Whether my job is a real job is a matter of opinion, I suppose, since I am one of the overpaid elite.

Re: Pay

IT Specialist
DOI
Fri Jun 9, 2006 11:11 AM
Let's see - per Encarta
Libertarian - 1. Advocate of individual responsibility
2. Advocate of individual freedom

Sounds good to me. My question is, why would you use it as an obviously derogatory adjective?! Regardless, I certainly would not ascribe that adjective to the writer of the obviously slanted "statistical" study. Anytime these so called studies come out on averages, you know its wildly inaccurate. There's plenty of problems in the pay systems in govt but there's plenty of the same in the private sector. CEO salaries for one. Funny how the study skipped that part altogether, eh?!

CATO Comparison of private & federal average pay

Pyschologist
DOT
Thu May 18, 2006 9:09 AM

Post Reply

The CATO Institute "study" is highly misleading. The report is not based on a comparison of like jobs to like jobs (for example, I/O Psychologist in the private sector to Personnel Psychologist in the federal sector).

Re: CATO Comparison of private & federal average pay

Investigation
Treasury
Thu May 18, 2006 7:37 PM
Exactly! Compare apples to apples, then let's discuss being over-paid.

Re: CATO Comparison of private & federal average pay

Computer/Network Support
DOD/USAF
Mon May 22, 2006 1:55 PM
The Cato Institute has an obvious anti-federal worker bias. They preach the simple gospel that contractor workers are good...government workers are bad!! Also called propoganda, to serve the business community and not so much the tax payer and worker!!
Total Comments: 125
Page 1 of 13

« Previous | Next »

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.