Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 6
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Turmoil in Alaska
Total Comments: 6
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2114 | +0.0012 | +0.70% |
| F | $13.6201 | -0.0062 | +2.14% |
| C | $13.8116 | -0.0706 | +4.49% |
| S | $17.9282 | -0.1903 | +8.91% |
| I | $18.5079 | -0.0782 | -0.16% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1968 | -0.0789 | +3.59% |
| L 2030 | $15.9593 | -0.0673 | +3.23% |
| L 2020 | $15.7365 | -0.0532 | +2.72% |
| L 2010 | $15.4595 | -0.0197 | +1.57% |
| L Income | $14.0856 | -0.0155 | +1.48% |
March 22, 2010
Search:
Custom Search
Home | About Us | FAQ's |
Site Map | Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
RSS 
|
Twitter 
| Mobile
© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Turmoil in Alaska
Interior
Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:34 AM
Post Reply
Gosh, this is one of those stories that must have lots of interesting details - all of which are omitted from the story! FedSmith, don't be such a tease!
Turmoil in Alaska
USDA
Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:31 AM
Post Reply
Kudos to the former State Director's Secretary! Being a whistleblower takes guts and perseverance, good luck in your future employment with USDA in Alaska. You will need it
Not surprising
Does it matter?
Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:27 AM
Post Reply
This always happens; an employee tries to give sound advice to a supervisor but it turns around to bite you.
To make matters worst, the Agency does not admit any fault, although most likely the Human Resource Manager, as well as the Administrative Officer of Alaska probably were involved in the soliciting or actual investigation ordered against the employee. The State Director could not have ordered a misconduct investigation without going through the Administrative Division.
These results are not surprising....
Full Story
DOD
Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:35 PM
Post Reply
The link to the full story as provided by the Anchorage Daily News.
http://www.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8007022p-7900118c.html
Re: Full Story
Interior
Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:06 AM
Retired - Not Resigned
Army
Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:37 AM
Post Reply
Bill Allen was also found guilty of violating Hatch Act from another complaint. A complaint was made in August 2002 and OSC just concluded their investigation. OSC's investigative results stated that "evidence was found to conclude that Mr. Allen violated the Hatch Act when he requested assistance from a subordinate while preparations were being made for the campaign event...however, because Mr. Allen has resigned from federal service, OSC has closed its complaint file in this matter."
Also, Mr. Allen was allowed to retire, not resign. By retiring he was allowed to take certain benefits (still paid for by the tax payer) into retirement.