I can't see anyone rating Obama when he came into office with a host of problems, which consists of bad decisions that were already made by the previous President. He can't clean up this mess overnight, but yet there are so many quick to judge him and they probably say anything when the previous president has been messing for 8 years.
Re: Obama Performance
IT Specialist DOD Wed May 13, 2009 12:13 PM
I think you need to keep in mind that Bush only spent 350Billion of the TARP money. Obama could have said we are going down the wrong path. Instead, he spent the other 350 Bilion and added another 800 Billion in Stimulus. Congress added the 410 billion omnumbus bill and is now working on Obamas 3.5 trillion dollar budget bill. You also need to keep in mind that it was Bush and Republicans warning the Democrats that if the housing regulations were not fix, it would lead to economic problems. The Democrats blocked needed reforms and certainly bare a degree of responsibility for the mess we are in. Whatever Bush did or didn't do does not justify the amount of money being printed and spent by this administration. The bill will come due in a few years.
Polling results
Director Dept of Navy Wed May 13, 2009 9:25 AM
Appears the results of this poll is split down the political lines.....democrats and republicans.
Go figure!!!
And why are we doing this at 100 days? Is this a take off the first gulf war? !00 days to liberate Kuwait?
OBAMA OPINION
RETIRED RETIRED BOP Wed May 13, 2009 9:25 AM
Full time Federal employmentgives your readers the luxury option of kicking back and viewing unemployment and this recession with Conservative and ambivalent eyes. They have steady incomes and are keeping food on their tables and the mortgage paid. But the country has been in a mess for quite some time. Federal workers only see it thru their 401 K's. The smart ones just transferred everything to the G or F Funds and left them there. I give Obama credit for trying hard. Defintitely more of a concerted effort than his predecessor who's claim to fame was IRAQ. Remember, this just did not happen over night. And it will take years to undo this mess. Fed workers, Just be thankful you have a good job and quit being so critical!!!
Re: OBAMA OPINION
Federal Worker DoD Wed May 13, 2009 1:29 PM
You forget, i'm a taxpayer also. I have every right to be critical of the behaviour and spending habits of this administration. Go back to your Kool-aid.
Re: OBAMA OPINION
Federal Employee CBP Wed May 13, 2009 3:27 PM
DoD worker, not all who has a wait and see approach to this administrations decisions drink kool aid. Why is it that if someone expresses a desire to see the outcome of the President's decisions they are belittled (i.e., "go back to your kool aid")?
It was people just like you who was bascially destroyed anyone who expressed a negative opinion of GW during his first TERM (not 100 days) in office. Look at what happened to the Dixie Chicks, just because a member of that group said she was embarrased to be from the same state as GW. Their career was blown out of the water. But now you people have no qualms making judgement after this President has been in office a little over 100 days.
Re: OBAMA OPINION
Federal Worker DoD Wed May 13, 2009 3:43 PM
Federal Employee
CBP
I'm an Indie. The response was to the original poster who basically said that I have a federal job so I need to shut up and color. I guess your political bias allows you to be blinded also. Too bad you are caught up in the political spin cycle. Me? I criticize them all when I disagree with them -- Obama, Bush, Clinton......gasp, even my local politicians. I like to think of myself as the equal opportunity AH. Don't forget the sugar.
President's performance rating
Electronics Engineer Army Wed May 13, 2009 9:33 AM
What a surprise. Your readers' evaluation of President Obama's performance almost exactly mirrors your readers' voting in the election. Had this been a formal poll the difference between pre- and post election percentages would be well within the statistical margin of error.
The poll's main showing is that your respondents aren't prepared to change their opinions based on performance, but cling to their preferences regardless of actual results. Put another way, your respondents select the results they evaluate and ignore anything that conflicts with their preconceived beliefs. It's not surprising, but it's also a waste of time.
Survey
Retired manager USPS Wed May 13, 2009 9:33 AM
I find it interesting that the national polls almost unanimously give Obama well over 50% approval ratings so far. Since we've just passed the 100 day mark, I would be surprised if the percentage remains that high for 4 years. The point is, most Americans are pleased with what he's done so far.
I've come to the conclusion that Fedsmith.com either has a slightly conservative bias or that the readership leans in that direction - and that's okay as long as folks understand that your survey results are slightly out of step with other surveys asking the same question.
Re: Survey
Reformed Conservative DFAS Wed May 13, 2009 1:23 PM
Fedsmith readers skew way right, but I'm not convinced they're representative of Federal employees in general. Anybody can access, and comment on, Fedsmith--I don't think the nuttier wingnuts here are in fact Federal employees. It defies probability that the 20-odd (very odd) per cent of the population that still identifies with the Republican party would produce so many Federal employees.
even split
it specialist USGS Wed May 13, 2009 9:35 AM
Lots of polarized people answered this survey, as is usually the case in a non scientific survey.
Slightly more than half voted for mccain and slightly more than half don't like obama.
To get more insight you should have added questions about the previous administration.
How many voted for Bush in 2004?
How many think that was a mistake?
I'd bet you get the same distribution.
Generally people who scream socialist and call names at obama, voted for Bush and won't accept that his 8 years
put this country in the shape it is in now.
This survey made clear to me who reads this web page and not much else. I wonder what the same surveys on FOX and MSNBC would result in.
Re: even split
Federal Worker DoD Wed May 13, 2009 1:34 PM
Please, your political bias is showing.........
Re: even split
it spec usgs Thu May 14, 2009 9:38 AM
My bias is obvious, there was no attempt to hide it, and in that way my response was not any different from the entirely polarized survey response. The survey is meaningless. This is of course due to it's voluntary nature sampling readers to a website that trends conservative.
How many articles/links on how to fire a Fed, Feds are overpaid, etc does it take to make that clear? I just wonder if this site should be called, Smallergovernmentwithmorecontractorsbutdonttouchmyretifement.com
Just say No
Acountant, Retired GS 14 DOE, Albuquerque Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 AM
This site is full of conservatives, mostly white male professionals, so of course they don't approve of Obama. Loook at how they voted. Toyally out of wack with the USA.The party of No. No health care change, keep Iraqu at war forever, no choice, no gay marriage, no stimulus, no global warming, no science, no evolution, no female equality, no EEO, no birth control .
The result: the party has no minorities, no Control of any region except the confederacy, No republicans in the white house. No control of the House, No control of the senate. and a party made up of 21% of the country There are not enough white male confedreates to control anything. Grow up or or go the way of the whigs, and federalists
Re: Just say No
Consumer safety inspector USDA Wed May 13, 2009 11:26 AM
I think this guy must've attended publik skool to !
Re: Just say No
Federal Worker DoD Wed May 13, 2009 2:04 PM
Acountant, Retired GS 14
DOE, Albuquerque
I am a conservative, white male professional (not sure why the initial poster felt it neccessary to use race). I do not agree with the policies of BHO; not because I'm conservative, white or a professional, but because I believe his policies are ill conceived and will be disasterous to this country.
Re: Just say No
QAR Retired DCMA Wed May 27, 2009 10:58 AM
Talk about NO BRAINS!! Where do you come off knocking that the site is full of conservatives and how do you know that their is so many white professionals? You should thank God that there is still some folks who "are totally out of whack"(corrected spelling) with the rest of the idiots in the United States who were no taken in by the BS of this phony President who is Kenyan. As more and more people are hearing their head pop out of that dark spot you can tell yourself only 1340 days left until the corrections of 2012 and we flush the biggest turd down the toilet of history.
Give'm a chance
Tax Compliance Officer IRS Wed May 13, 2009 9:39 AM
Obama do not deserve the negative press he has been given. McCain would have not done any better to stimulate the economy. He's only been in place just over a year, give it time. If the last one in office cared, Obama wouldn't have had the pressure of trying to fix this mess....
Re: Give'm a chance
Analyst DoD Wed May 13, 2009 12:33 PM
"He's only been in place just over a year, give it time." ROFL! Imagine that ... and Obama supporter with NO clue!
Re: Give'm a chance
American Education Wed May 13, 2009 3:48 PM
Not only does he lack a clue, he lacks proper grammar and punctuation.
It reminds me of an appraisal once. The writer actually stated, "He be good worker."
Reality
HR DFAS Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 AM
If we the people of the United States are looking to President Obama to change the outlook of this current economic situation; unfortunately, we are entering into a hope of futility. This will take all Americans working, praying and sacrificing together. We, Americans are to selfish to sacrifice for our brother and sisters. Afterall we care more for our pets than we do the homeless. Lets stop critizing our leaders, start praying for and supporting them through the good and the bad times. They are just fallible human beings; not gods. What made America great was "in God we trust", not in man we trust. It seems as though we have forgotten that.
Your all geniuses
retired U S Postal Service Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 AM
Bring on Rush,Newt,Dick all the leaders of the party that got us into the mess were in now.Does anybody really know what socialism is. Cantor and the rest of his friends is what we need with all of their great ideas.Cut taxes don't spend.Cut taxes for 8 years that really save us a ton of money.The rich get richer and the middle class is drowning.
Re: Your all geniuses
American Education Wed May 13, 2009 3:50 PM
Yeah, an da gramer and spelin be gotten worser. Give me a break!!
Survey on President Obama's Performance so Far
HRA IRS Wed May 13, 2009 9:43 AM
It is evident that the small portion of Federal Employees who took part in this survey are the same ones who take part in most of the surveys given by this paper. While Obama was running for office the Surveys from ten with the same federal employees responding, said McCain was going to win (in their opinion). Wrong then and just as wrong NOW! Most people who can't or won't see the light for change in this country are just plain out of touch with the world. This is only the begining to many changes in this life time. Get over it and get ready for it. It is just not the presidential elections, our way of life has and is changing and for the better.. Equality is why the real reason why some people can't get with the program, they know who they are, because allot of you will be reading my response.
Re: Survey on President Obama's Performance so Far
HR DoD Wed May 13, 2009 3:51 PM
Go UN! Go UN! It's the new World Order!!!
ROFLMAO
Bush Administration
HR Specialist Dept of Homeland Security Wed May 13, 2009 9:44 AM
I can't believe the people that think everything was o.k. with the Bush admin. They must all be blind or crazy. Bush got us in this mess and Obama is doing his best to get us out. After 8 years of Bush, all Republicans need to just shut up and give the Dems their chance. It sure can't be any worse than it has been. And as far as putting our children and grandchildren in debt, this will all be over and done with by then. They'll have a much brighter future under the Dems then they ever could under the Reps. Just think of our children and grandchildren in Irag and Afghanistan, what kind of future is that?
Re: Bush Administration
Accountant Commerce Wed May 13, 2009 3:56 PM
HR Specialist
Dept of Homeland Security
"...as far as putting our children and grandchildren in debt, this will all be over and done with by then. They'll have a much brighter future under the Dems then they ever could under the Reps. Just think of our children and grandchildren in Irag and Afghanistan, what kind of future is that?"
Psssst, you apparently have not figured it out yet. But, I'll help you. Our children and grandchildren will be living in a 3rd world country like Iraq and Afghanistan because Obama is spending us into a 3rd world country..
Re: Bush Administration
Admin Asst DOE Wed May 13, 2009 6:21 PM
"all Republicans need to just shut up and give the Dems their chance. "
Why? The Dems spewed out nasty rhetoric the entire 8 years of the Bush Administration, why should they get a free pass now?
Trying to quell free speech huh....
Anomalous Results
HR Spec. USDA Wed May 13, 2009 9:48 AM
This was not a scientific survey by any stretch of the imagination. I doubt it even represents the views of most Federal employees.
The President's job approval ratings in poll after poll have been around 67%. That is in stark contrast to the FedSmith poll of self-selected participants--an extremely biased sample by any measure.
Re: Anomalous Results
Analyst DoD Thu May 14, 2009 8:22 AM
Yes, this survey IS skewed. FedSmith has a large portion of people who read it because they are smart enough and care enough to educate themselves.
Obama Comments
Contract Speialist USAF Wed May 13, 2009 9:49 AM
I wounder if you had also included what you race and age were in the comments would t show a picture. I personally don't like the guy, but we need to give him a chance. He won the vote on young voters with no real life experiance and 99% of the black vote, that almost always vote democrate anyway, but this was "their man". They came down on if you vote against him (which I did) it was a color issue. For me he is very much to the left, he always has been, I'm very much to the right, I always have been. I bet the comments would mostly be young and minoritys supporting him and white,middle class, and older people disapproving of him, just like the election....
President's Performance Evaluation
federal employee DoD Wed May 13, 2009 9:57 AM
The human resources clerk from Ft. Campbell, KY must not have been reading the same newspapers, magazines or watching the same TV reports that the rest of the world were looking at. People were excited as in happy about the election of Pres. Obama. I am hearing rumors that a lot of the military bases in the south refuse to post the new President's picture unless Obama actually visits that installation. That sounds like Dereliction of Duty among other things. I should know, I too work for the DoD.
Obamas progress
retired aquisition specialist Defense Logistics Agency Wed May 13, 2009 10:01 AM
I have read some of the responses submitted by the readers, in my opinion they are mostly biased in both directions. It is far too early to tell if his policies will be effective but extreme times calls for extreme measures, let's just hope they are the correct measures. What Obama is doing, some call socialism, has been done before in difficult times.
The failing banking situation we are in is the result of greed and leveraging in the financial sector designed to create huge profits for the banks has gone unchecked for years, this happened due to poor government regulations. I believe in capitalism, it has helped to make this country great, but when the cat's away the mice will play. Think how many thieves there would be if not for the police.
As a former government employee I also think the readers remarks are basically the result of their prejudice of their own political party lines.
At least it can be said that Obama is not fiddling while Rome burns.
WAT IS HAPPENING TO THIS COUNTRY
ATSS FAA Wed May 13, 2009 10:02 AM
A blind eye is constantly in the forefront. Doen't our politicians see what we are allowing to happen to this country. With our heads buried in the sand, we are increasing our debt, and giving up our freedons. Our constitution is out the window. With out recognizing our current laws, we are coming apart at the seams. Now no one seems to care enough to do anything about it. Trying to get our senators, and representatives to do the right thing, is not happening. Obama, I wish you were the breath of fresh air everyone was talking about! But I think not. We need hjelp right away!
Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
Project Manager HUD Wed May 13, 2009 10:03 AM
God help us to survive these four years!!! Where is congress? They were designed to act as a check and balance. They are as far out to lunch (LEFT) as obama!
This seems a little like locking the fox in the hen house.
Re: Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
usda worker Wed May 13, 2009 1:06 PM
I think i remember people saying the same thing when the republicans took control of congress. I guess the last time this happened to the other side it wasn't just the fox in the henhouse, it was the fox, their relatives, their contractors, their friends, their friends that helped get them elected, their friends who think america is in a state of failure because we have a gov't , their friends..... Come on. lets at least try to get original and not follow the party line
Re: Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
Analyst DOD Wed May 13, 2009 1:17 PM
Congress was right there manipulating the funds in their favor. Deep pockets for Fat politicians. This is not entirely either Presidents fault. They both had lots of help.
Rational thinking about Obama
Human Resources Specialist USDA Wed May 13, 2009 10:04 AM
Whether I voted for Obama or not is irrelevant now. He is my President because the election process my country uses determined that. I love my country, with all of its imperfections, and I support my President. That said, although I approve of his willingness to move assertively to take on the big issues and am hopeful his leadership will be successful, I am skeptical and withhold my approval until I see more tangible results of success. He is still setting things in motion, and the results are several months, even years away from being rationally evaluated.
Obama Performance Evaluation comments
Human Resources Specialist Department of Health and Human Services Wed May 13, 2009 10:07 AM
Many commenters/voters unfortunately latch onto words like "socialist" without actually understanding or caring about their true meaning. To be socialist is to believe in redistributing the wealth. What is the role of the Federal government, but to collect the taxes in a central location and redistribute the money to the states and pay for other federal priorities, which the taxpayer may or may not approve of. The Government has been doing this for years - redistributing the wealth from those of us who work to those of us who don't for whatever reason. Unless, voters want to change our system of government then I would expect them to go along with the current situation and try to have an impact on those issues and programs that they believe should or should not be funded and stop crying about words like "socialism" that they truly don't understand.
About What You'd Expect
Operations Analyst DCMA Wed May 13, 2009 10:10 AM
Although I didn't bother with this poll, I'm somehow reassured by the split. At this point, I'd prefer a President who is willing to take the risks that would displease a large segment of the FedSmith respondents who are, as a group, more to the right than the country as a whole. This is someone who has beliefs and is willing to lead - whether you like the direction he is going or not. Give him a chance - there's a big mess to be cleaned up & it won't be resolved in 100 days or six months.
F for FAILURE!!!!
QAR DoD Wed May 13, 2009 10:22 AM
What is it about Obama that makes people ignore his imcompetence? Is it his looks? His education? His personality? His "way with words?" It just boggles my mind! One would think this admnistration was the second coming of Christ! What will it take for people to realize the America of 101 days ago will be totally unrecognizable in 3 1/2 more years? It scare me to death!
Re: F for FAILURE!!!!
usda worker Wed May 13, 2009 1:14 PM
What is it about Obama (BUSH) that makes people ignore his imcompetence? Is it his looks? His education? His personality? His "way with words?" It just boggles my mind! One would think t (his) admnistration was the second coming of Christ, for capitalists! What will it take for people to realize the America of 101 days ago will be totally unrecognizable in 3 1/2 more years? It scare me to death!
boy am I glad this quote was not used on the last president. sounds funny when you throw in bush instead of obama, but in fact it was terribly true and devastating for this country
Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
worker Bee Wed May 13, 2009 10:23 AM
Socialism is the government ownwership of business all the time. Not just when we are just trying to help. There is only one socialist country (Venezuela) Libralism is the establishment of government social programs to create a strong middle class. Liberalism believes that middle classes are created by government institutions. Otherwise you end up with a Venezuela because there is no middle class and the top 1% owns 89% of everything. So Republicans be careful with your language or they may start calling you Elitist, Racist and Nazi's, since there is elements of truth in your conservative movement as there are elements of truth in the Liberal movement that relates to socialism
Re: Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
IT Specialist DOD Wed May 13, 2009 1:42 PM
"Socialism is the government ownwership of business all the time." The Government is refusing to let banks pay back the TARP money. The Government is forcing banks to convert the Government preferred stock (Tax Payer Debt) to common stock. Common Stock gives the Goverment voting rights or in other words, ownership in the bank. Voting rights allows the Government to decide who gets loans or sits on the board of directors. The Government was also going to own common stock in Chrysler and GM. Sounds like your definition of Socialism.
Re: Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
td off Wed May 13, 2009 2:57 PM
Look at the definition of socialism. You do not know what you are talking about. Georgr Bush started the tarp. Is GB a socialist? If so the Republican Party is socialist
Re: Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
IT Specialist DOD Wed May 13, 2009 7:18 PM
Nationalism is the better term for what is going on with the banks. However there is nothing in TARP about not letting the banks pay back the loans. The stock conversion idea was started in Obama's administration not Bush's. Wall Street Journal published an article a month ago about how some of the big banks were being told by the Government it would not accept repayment of the TARP Loans. Instead the loans (Taxpayer Money) are to be converted to common stock giving the Government control of the banks. Nationalism is part of a Socialist Agenda. Stalin, Chavez, Castro can provide you with a history course in how to move a country to Socialism. Today there is article on how Obama wants to set compensation packages for the Banks to include companies who didn't take the TARP money. If you don't think he doesn't have a Socialist Agenda, you are clueless as to what is being done to our capitalist society.
we are Losing our Liberty
Managent Analyst DHS Wed May 13, 2009 10:37 AM
Watching Mr. Obama ruin this country in front of my watching eyes is horrible. Spending is out of control. It's a power grab by the liberals. I am sick of him and Wanda Sikes.
Biased sampling but accurate readership profile
Doctor of Education GSA Wed May 13, 2009 10:39 AM
That your results are out of step with various public scientific polls is not surprising given that yours is a conservative-based publication with a tilted rightist leaning readership. You Grand Ole Partier's didn't really think you were fooling anybody, did you? Now lets have a poll of your writing and editorial staff. Come on... what are your party affiliations? Prove me wrong while letting a little sunlight in.
Obama Job Performance
Chief, Office of Management Analysis NIH Wed May 13, 2009 10:44 AM
Seems to me that the people who are worried about the burden on our granchildren are missing one important thing. If we don't pay the bill now to feed, cloth, educate and ensure they and their parents have a home - there's no chance they'll be able to survive much less "take on the burden of the future".
Time for outreach
Fly on the wall Outside the Beltway Wed May 13, 2009 10:55 AM
As these numbers reflect a much more conservative bent than the nation and government as a whole, it seems as if FedSmith should be working to broaden its audience. The many columns addressing how Feds are overpaid, disciplining employees and upending their unions may be taking its toll on "blue" readers. Your readership's demographic might be of interest as an adjunct to these numbers.
Voters & Ethics
Manager BIA Wed May 13, 2009 11:03 AM
In my lifetime there has been no administration with a lower set of ethical standards. The election of President Obama demonstrates that uneducated voters will elect a "Rock Star" regardless of the person's lack of experience. This administration is way beyond its "Peter Pricnciple" level of competence. But he does speak well as long as the teleprompter is working.
Re: Voters & Ethics
worker Bee Wed May 13, 2009 11:35 AM
So the public was smart in 1980, 84, 88,2000 and 2004 but stupid in 1976, 92, 96 and 2008. Interesting. You are in agreement with Sean Hanity. If obama is a socialist then Republicans must be racist. They both have a grain of truth
Re: Voters & Ethics
Fly on the wall Outside the Beltway Wed May 13, 2009 11:36 AM
A lesson in ethics. 4294 of our (mostly young) patriots have died in Iraq. More than in the World Trade Center.
Q: And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?
Rumsfeld, May 30, 2003: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around
Re: Voters & Ethics
Health Physicist DON Thu May 14, 2009 11:23 AM
I know this is off topic, but this always gets me.
You make a huge deal of the deaths of our servicemen in the service of their country (which it is, of course). Yet 40,000 or more will lose their life on our highways this year alone, just like last year and the countless years before.
Where's the huge outcry for the senseless loss of life?
Most of those deaths were caused by things within our control...
Drinking, seat belts, inattention, sleeping, speeding, etc, etc. Where's the outrage?
The number of servicemens deaths is even smaller when you look at it over the several years of this war.
Before you all get on your high horses, my nephew died in Iraq in the Army. I know he died in service to his country and that he made a difference. I couldn't be prouder of him than my own son who's in the air force.
I'm not belittling his death or any one elses. It's tragic, and I miss him terribly. But there are far worse ways to go in my mind.
The Unmaking of America
Community Involvement Team leader U.S. EPA Wed May 13, 2009 11:07 AM
President Obama made the "Unmaking of America" his goal clear from the beginning of his campaign. He is going to change America, i.e. "Unmake America." He is going to destroy the basic fiber of our being and make us a socialist country. His street organizing is learned from his Chicago days - "instill fear, change the rules and do what you want before the people have chance to realize what happened" is right on target. He will nationalize everything and give the unions unprecedented power. The true taxpayers of America and our children will regret the day we elected this president. If you read his books ywith an open mind you will understand he does not like America. He is making that fact very clear to the world. He has never hidden his agenda, many Americans just bought into it. Why not - give me more and expect me to contribute less, I'll elect you again and again.
Obama
Postmaster USPS Wed May 13, 2009 11:08 AM
I'm very impressed with the current President's direction. At least he's doing - something. The former screwups of the previous administration's pocket lining and family revenge have left us all frustrated and hanging with no end in sight. Obama is moving forward, even though the right now isn't pretty, maybe we will become a nation the world can be proud of in the future - after we pay off the debt that Bush borrowed to fund his pet projects.
Obama's Survey
Information Technology Specialist USDA Wed May 13, 2009 11:08 AM
I have mixed feelings about Pres.Obama's performance in office. I agree that we needed get out from under the last 8 years of the Bush Admin. However, I think Obama is trying to do too much at once. He needs to concentrate on the economic problems of this country and how it impacts the little guy not big business. Why aren't the banks that received money under ARRA 2009 being forced to help keep people in their home by refinancing their loans to affordable interest rate? It would make more sense than having all these foreclosed homes in inventory. Also force the lenders to lower the interest rate on credit cards. The 2nd thing is the war in Iraq & Afghanistan - we need to end those as quickly as possible - it has cost too much in terms of money and American lives. I also don't understand the relunctancy on Obama part to release records about himself - birth certificate, college transcripts, etc. What is he hiding?
FedSmith Readers
Director USDA Wed May 13, 2009 11:26 AM
If it wasn't for the important articles that are aimed at Federal workers, I would never visit this site. The comments are usually filled with hateful rigth-wing talking points. This really comes out when there's an article or poll such as this one about President Obama or about equality of benefits for Gay & Lesbian employees.
Re: FedSmith Readers
hr spec dod agency Wed May 13, 2009 11:55 AM
This is one site that does not require that comments be "politically correct" and gives different sides of an issue--even if it is likely to irritate union activists or anyone else. I applaud the authors for daring to print comments such as those that were submitted with this article. On some sites, one would think that federal employees were of one mind and all left leaning liberals. Here, at least, we see the screaming lefties and those on the right as well. That is probably a more realistic reflection of the entire federal workforce and not just the social agencies that are located in Washington, DC but includes the agencies spread around the world.
Wait...
LR/ER Specialist Veterans Affairs Wed May 13, 2009 11:37 AM
23 people aren't sure who they voted for? Scary...
Obama Administration survey
Claims REP Social Security admin Wed May 13, 2009 11:42 AM
I have read the survey comments in this article. At this point, i am neither for or against our President's actions or his administration. I am giving it time to see what the efforts of his administration do for our country and our economy. How can we judge the efforts so early in the game? It took 8 years or longer perhaps for our country to get to the bad shape it is in today, so what makes us think or better yet, what qualifies us to rush into judgement so soon? Some actions that our president is taking may seem haste or not well thought of; however, maybe in the long run those same actions may prove otherwise. Americans, give it time. Be patient.
Comments about POTUS' Performance
Transportation Regulations Specialist U.S. DOT Wed May 13, 2009 11:42 AM
I had no idea that there were so many Republican government employees, since I have always heard that they spit on government and its programs. If most of them despise President Obama and his programs, why don't they quit in large numbers, use their expertise, and go to work for private industry. Let people who are real public servants have their jobs.
I never heard them complain when the former administration and its cronies were robbing the government blind, getting us into the worst economic turndown since WWII, fighting two unnecessary wars, and replacing government jobs with millions of contractors for no apparent reason.
Re: Comments about POTUS' Performance
Analyst DoD Wed May 13, 2009 12:55 PM
Of course there are lots of Republican government employees. "Employee" is the key word here. We WORK for a living rather than sit at home and wait for a handout from someone who works. Now don't you feel silly....
Re: Comments about POTUS' Performance
usda worker Wed May 13, 2009 1:31 PM
dod analyst, you are right. We do feel silly now! We must be so blinded by someone who is trying to help america, that we have forgotten the republican/norquist mantra, If the gov't does not work why do we need it? All of the republican employees working undercover are still probably trying to achieve the great goal. A gov't that does not do right for the most needy and disadvantaged citizens is not worth having and if we follow the right wing ideas, we will not have one, because we will not be able to help our least fortunate because we have allowed the richest of us to horde the money from the rest of us. Silly me and the rest of us that have a little compasion for those less fortunate then ourselves.
Obama's Job Performance
Manager U S Postal Service Wed May 13, 2009 12:00 PM
In reading negative comments, I see they are exactly the same as the rhetoric posted by McCain supporters on You.Tube. They were sour grapes then as they are now. Obama won. Get over it! The socialism rhetoric and inept acts of trying to instill this baseless fear is absolutely ridiculous and no one's buying it... not even you! President Obama has managed to secure respect for America in the World. Even America's enemies are pausing to watch and reaccess their positions. The economy is slowly taking a turn for the better. It will take time to clean up this mess. He told us that, and we're willing to give him the time he needs. People are not only feeling more hopeful but are volunterring to assist one another as never before. This man is smart and has surrounded himself with the very best minds and qualifications available. So either support him, or just sit back and enjoy the ride. This fear moungering serves no purpose other then to divide. America is sick of it We're beyond it.
Re: Obama's Job Performance
hr spec dod agency Wed May 13, 2009 12:09 PM
And, by the way, most of these great minds are promising to pay their taxes in the future, unlike their past actions, because they are now on the public payroll.
Re: Obama's Job Performance
Manager DOI Wed May 13, 2009 2:23 PM
Hey USPS Manager: You state "This fear moungering serves no purpose other then to divide." SO what would YOU call it (IF NOT FEAR MONGERING!!!) when the Obama crew insisted that over 3/4's of a trillion $$$ "stimulus" had to be passed in such a big hurry that no one had any time to read it, because if it wasn't passed THAT DAY, the whole financial systems was going to disintergrate!!!
The Democrats were afraid that the Republicans and the majority of the taxpayers who will be paying for this accumulated debt for decades, WOULD find out what was in that bill, and then it might not pass, even with the Democratic majority. I consider myself an Independent and I am greatly disappointed with both the D's and the R's. Our current path (started by Bush and the R's) and kicked into overdrive by Obama and the D's will bring this country to ruin, and result in a stagnant economy for a very long time if the voters don't significantly reduce the size and power of our Federal Government!!!!
President Score Card
Program Manager DOD Wed May 13, 2009 12:17 PM
Great job! Mr. President Baraack Obama you could've choosen any other career but you choose to help the American people in the widest disemination possible. I applaud your very effort to stand up for all people against the tolls and evils of society to try and help the elderly, the sick, and the downtrodden so that we as America can stand. If we don't stand for something we circum to evil nations that will be glad to come in America and rule, thus changing America as we know, to a communistic rule. My hat goes off to you sir as a Public Servent. I say Thank You if no one else will.
Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
USAF PCO USAF Wed May 13, 2009 12:25 PM
It's only been 115 days or so since the man was inaugurated, for Pete's sake! None of you 'antis' want to give the guy a chance because, if he succeeds, he'll have refuted everything you believe in. Where were you people when Bush was trampling all over the Constitution, in the name of national security & war powers? Where were you when Bush was sole-sourcing & outsourcing everything to his Ktr benefactors & spending hundreds of billions in Iraq? Where were you when the richest 1% of this country ran the banking system & Wall Street into the ground? It is obvious to me, after reading these comments, that the country is almost irrepairably divided. Perhaps all the haters-because that is exactly what they are: anti-everything that isn't white or 'faith-based' should move on down to that new land of opportunity: Texas, where Gov Perry is saying Texas should secede. Interesting that the only bastion the Republican/Libertarians have left is the old Confederacy! Get thee hence!
President a Performance Evaluation
grunt cant say Wed May 13, 2009 12:43 PM
If you are black it wouldn't matter if BO was a Felon, that would think he was the greatest thing since sliced bread. Look at the foremore Mayors of DC and Detroit. Basically birds of a feather,, those that are truely uneducated other than being a BO look alike, flock together.
Re: President a Performance Evaluation
BMEU USPS Wed May 13, 2009 1:10 PM
Wow, this racist posting (about black supporters of BO) is really the cherry on top of all the anti-BO sewage I see here every day. Kinda parrots the recent spewage from Boss Limbaugh about how Colin Powell supports Obama only because he's black. To which I must ask: really? then what is Condi Rice's problem? How come she isn't supporting Obama? I mean, forget low, how ignorant can these people get?
Re: President a Performance Evaluation
IT Specialist DOD Thu May 14, 2009 7:23 AM
I know a lot blacks who do have buyers remorse. They are figuring out their taxes are going to go up significantly to pay for liberal policies/agenda. Taxes on pop, alcohol, food, and health care to pay for health care. Energy taxes to help fund Global Warming fraud. People are waking up. Even the 40 percent who pay no income taxes are realizing they will be taxed in other ways through local, state, and federal taxes on goods they use. Interesting, the polls show a majority of Americans dislike his policies, but still give him high ratings. The question is can this honeymoon last long enough to get his agenda through congress. Health care will be a major test.
truly appalling
hr spec dod agency Wed May 13, 2009 1:00 PM
What I find truly appalling is the cavalier, antagonistic, and sometimes hateful manner with which some readers dismiss the concerns of others. Kudos to this site for publishing all points of view--including those among my colleagues who seem to think the definition of political debate is "agree with me or be damned."
We are taking on debt in the trillions with no apparent way to pay for it--at the same time our Medicare and Social Security systems are going to go bankrupt. We are raising taxes (on the "rich" allegedly) and we know more taxes are going to hit all of us on energy, and probably a national sales tax of 7 - 10% as we try to pay for the massive programs that may, or may not, have any impact.
These are valid concerns. Those that dismiss them as "anti" or "racist" or other pejorative terms seem designed to force everyone to have the same political beliefs as the person posting the comment. They are no better than the secret police in a dictatorship that forces conformity.
We should have concerns about ignoring our constitution (see: chrysler bailout) and unbelievable govt. spending. Instead of shouting at those who are concerned, try to pay attention and engage in civil discourse instead of ranting and name-calling.
OBAMA Rating
Manager IRS Wed May 13, 2009 1:27 PM
Do we have to spend the next four years stroking this narcissus ego who is continually telling terrorist countries how sorry he is about how the american people behave? My vote is Impeach him before the government has control of every business and has completly given away the farm. I heard this morning coming to work that his latest inititive will make it more difficult for illegal immigrents to obtain employment but easier for them to get welfare. That really made my day.
Re: OBAMA Rating
Fly on the wall Outside the Beltway Wed May 13, 2009 5:01 PM
It may be time for you to change radio stations.
President Obama's Rating by Feds
Staff Assistant Social Security administration Wed May 13, 2009 2:21 PM
It is clear that McCain suporters were more eager to participate.
Obviously there is a big diference in perspective.
I myself see no reason to disaprove. I believe this country is better than when he took over and we keep improving.
Re: President Obama's Rating by Feds
Admin Asst DOE Wed May 13, 2009 5:39 PM
Staff Assistant, in what areas are we better off? What policies of his are you speaking of and what about them makes them better?
A general statement of "I believe this country is better" means nothing unless you tell us the rationale, the evidence you're basing your statement on. A general statement with no specifics can be interpreted any way a reader wants to interpret it.
SOCIALISM DEFINED
td off Wed May 13, 2009 3:00 PM
Socialism in political thought refers to economic theories of social organization advocating collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equality for all individuals, with an egalitarian method of compensation.[1][2] Modern socialism originated in the late 19th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticized the effects of industrialization and private ownership on society. Karl Marx posited that socialism (the disappearance of class and therefore state) would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution after a transitional stage from capitalism called the dictatorship of the proletariat.
socialism
Accountant USDA Forest Service Wed May 13, 2009 3:03 PM
Obama is inexperienced in economic policy, military policy, financial policy, and foreign policy. It is highly doubtful that he is even a citizen of our great country....which may be why he is not concerned about taking away our freedoms, spending money we don't have, increasing government roles in our private lives, burdening our grandchildren with a debt they won't be able to pay, and inviting terrorists to negotiate with us. The issue of illegal immigration has been in the background, but considering the speed with which his 'changes' have been implemented, I'm sure it's soon to come to the forefront. God help us....we need it.
President's Performance Rating
HR Manager (retired) DOD Wed May 13, 2009 3:24 PM
As I wrote when you first published your “performance” survey, what your gave the readers is not a performance survey but a “like/dislike” survey. The majority of the comments prove my point. To measure someone’s performance you must have a rating plan with meaningful and measureable performance elements. I must say that I know of no place in either the public or private sector where what you published would pass for a performance rating plan or where its results would survive a third party review. Your results can be validate as opinions not as performance ratings.
Re: President's Performance Rating
manager dod agency Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 PM
From this comment, and it myopic view of politics from a personnel perspective, one might think that the readers of this site are a bunch of bureaucrats.
Perhaps those that took the survey understood the question anyway. One can obviously argue if it should be labeled "performance" or not. Or, in reality, no one really cares since we all understood the question and really don't care if it fits into a definition under 5 CFR or some such. But, if it makes you feel better, whine away and continue to display your superior knowledge and ownership of the word "performance."
Re: President's Performance Rating
HR Manager (retired) DOD Wed May 13, 2009 9:21 PM
To DOD Manager: First, this column is entitled: FedSmith: For the informed Fed. Second, assuming that the title readers use to describe themselves is correct most readers are either current or former Federal employees which to some make us current or former bureaucrats. Third, in the original article the editors clearly stated that they were soliciting a performance evaluation. And fourth, look at the latest article’s headline: Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation. It is obvious that the intent was for readers to evaluate the President’s performance. Unfortunately the form the editors used does not provide the reader the means, by any definition, to provide a performance rating. This is strictly an “I like or I don’t like” survey a conclusion which is supported by the content of most answers. Consequently, the goal was not met. As me whining, I never have it was normally the managers who “thought they understood the question.”
Intolerance is Unfortunate
manager dod agency Wed May 13, 2009 3:24 PM
It appears that there cannot be a poll such as this with a wide diversity of views being expressed without incurring wrath and rancor. That is too bad. A rational discussion of the issues would be helpful. Comments that appear to try and intimidate other people doesn't accomplish much except generate a similar counter. That appears to be the state of our political discourse in the country; not just here but in general in our media.
The relative small difference between this survey and national polls does not surprise me. Federal employees are well-off. We have very good benefits, job security and relatively high pay compared to the average American. We like to think of ourselves as in the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum for some reason but the reality is otherwise.
Many of my colleagues in the DC area have 2 incomes and make over $250,000 per year. They will be hit by higher taxes, along with taxes on electricity, AMT, etc. All of us will pay more. Many readers here will pay considerably more in taxes and possibly have a less well-off retirement as a result.
Blaming the site doesn't for printing comments from readers doesn't make much sense. I hear these comments every day; the difference is that the comments are in the public eye for everyone to see and free from intimidation. We are smart people; we know what we are supposed to think and we say what we are supposed to think. What we really think is oftentimes considerably different. It is unique to be able to read the comments that are posted here as a result.
Obama's performance
National program coordinator, Forest Service USDA (retired) Wed May 13, 2009 4:03 PM
Of course this is not a random sample. In surveys like this the people most satisfied (with Obama in this case) and displeased are most motivated to respond.
But during my time in the federal service I did note that a lot of die-hard conservatives held positions of importance and exercised perhaps undue (as distinct from balanced) influence over agency policy. New ideas and approaches were difficult to introduce, let along implement. And individuals who sided with their supervisors were most apt to be promoted.
Lack of Knowledge Exhibited by Federal Employees
Retired HR Professional Department of the Interior Wed May 13, 2009 4:22 PM
Wow! Thanks for publishing a summary of reader comments concerning President Obama's performance. I cannot believe how ignorant your conservative readers are about what needs to be done in the United States. Of course, I shouldn't be surprised as the Republicans have advanced no ideas and instead choose to cast blame on those that are doing their best to solve the nation's problems. I bet your conservative readers love their Federal pensions (with annual COLAs) and guranteed heath insurance at affordable costs (including access to Medicare), but do they want other Americans to have these benefits along with the job security they have enjoyed? I think not! They've gotten (or have) their's - now it's time to criticize anyone who would dare to address the problems created by the Bush legacy.
Richard Scott
President Obama Approval
Retired government employee Treasury Dept. Wed May 13, 2009 4:34 PM
President Obama is doing a great job. Its crazy to think he can fix eight years of Bush mess in four months. He has done more in trying to get this economy fixed in 4 months than Bush did in 8 years. Most of the negative reponses to Obama are evidently McCain supporters and they can't find anything positive that Obama has done and never will find anything positive. In their eyes only a Republican can get high marks regardless of how well the person performs. I'm just looking forward to Obama tackling this economy problem and coming up with positive resolutions. This is a messed up economy and all blessings go out to President Obama as he continues to tackle the problems.
Obama Negativity
Mid Level Mgr DOD Wed May 13, 2009 5:22 PM
I just can't believe that my "Brother" Federal Employees, 51 % of them disapprove with Obama's first few months! I realize that not everyone thinks the same but come on!!! I personally don't believe you can give an accurate measurement of the man until at least a year has passed us by. This first 100 day rating period showed us that the man can do more than one thing at the same time, can speak eloquently and make us understand the reasons why he is doing what he is doing and he is taking the time to tell us about it. And people are complaining about that!!! One thing I am thankful about is that I don't have to look at that nasty little smirk the other guy used to give us at his press conferences!!! Not to mention the arrogant way he spoke. No wonder we are regarded in a much lower light world wide. At least Obama is putting forth the effort to try to change the way other world leaders think of us. To call our newly elected officials "Crooks" and to call our Government a "Gangster or Socialist Government" is unfair and IGNORANT!!!! The man has taken office in the midst of an economic melt down, a war in Afganistan and Iraq (which he didn't get us into) and is putting forth an honest effort to rectify the situiation that was left to him. Give the man some real time to straighten out these probems, then if he doesn't meet your expectations then you can throw the first stone!!!
Re: Obama Negativity
Worker Fed Govt Thu May 14, 2009 4:30 PM
Does he speak eloquently-yes, with a teleprompter. He acts like the newest Hollywood icon rather than a respected head of our country. He gets more arrogant as the days go by. And yes, he is a socialist, no matter how you dice it. Guess what, despite how the movies made him out to be, Robin Hood was not a good guy. He flip-flops constantly. His "press agent" is an idiot. His appointees are questionable liars and cheaters, and our country is going down the financial tubes. Must I go on? Bring back Bill Clinton (not Hillary)!
Re: Obama Negativity
Reformed Conservative DFAS Fri May 15, 2009 7:40 AM
Worker: Just think, Obama will go down in history as the first politician ever to use a teleprompter! I'll bet all the others are wondering why they never thought to use one.
Re: Obama Negativity
DA Analyst Army Fri May 15, 2009 4:49 PM
Didn't President Reagan use teleprompters, too? So what? President Obama knows his topics, as demonstrated at the electronic town hall and his primetime press conferences.
Re: Obama Negativity
Programmer TSO Fri May 15, 2009 6:33 PM
This teleprompter talk makes interesting banter but it's not a significant topic.
In the big picture it's too soon to judge Obama's performance.
His most fanatical backers have been proclaiming that he's one of the best presidents ever, even saying that before he took office.
His most fanatical critics have called him a rabid socialist who will spend this country into the stone ages.
Both of these positions are emotionally biased and way too extreme to be seriously considered.
If we want to discuss this intelligently we need to get away from characterizing the man and instead examine the policies that are being put into place. When enough time has passed to observe the long term effects of these decisions then we can judge his performance.
The Non-President President
Safety Manager US Army Wed May 13, 2009 6:21 PM
The country is getting exactly what they deserve, 1984. The dawning of the one party government, like in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela and Cuba.
President Obama
Clerical IRS Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 PM
What can you say of people who would rather vote for an uneducated felon than a well educated, personable thinking man simply because of the color of his skin. America has finally moved into the 21st century however several generations have not.
Disapproval of President Obama's job !
supervisor of hematology DPALS Thu May 14, 2009 7:55 AM
President Obama is the most dangerous president we have had in office. He has held hands with all our enemies, Russia, Iran, China, etc. They will always be our enemies. We can not turn our backs on them or disarm our country. He is also trying to break the country finiancially with all this giving of money away.
If he gets control of the banks hello! dictator. Also this country was founded on Christian principles and if we step away from that be ready for God's jugements to start. We are just on the edge of His judgement.
Obama Job Performance
Revenue Agent Internal Revenue Service Thu May 14, 2009 8:22 AM
As a conservative, I disapprove of the job performance of President Obama. I would like to have seen that Corporate america be allowed to file bankruptcywithout any type of bailout. The stimulus bills only add to the mounting deficits that the US government is spending more than they can possibly pay back in our lifetime and stretches into the lives of our grandchildren and great grandchildren. Tax cuts for the highest taxpayers would generate more jobs for the private sector and we are cutting off their incentive to do so.
Re: Obama Job Performance
Master Universe Thu May 14, 2009 10:31 AM
But you lost. Get over it. You were in power for 40 years. Now it's the Democrat Socialist turn. lol
Obama Job Performance
Chief, Office of Management Analysis NIH Thu May 14, 2009 9:39 AM
The President has gone after the banks with their under-handed credit card practices, and the loan sharks posing as mortgage lenders, given a small amount to retirees quickly - and that's seen as his trying to turn America into a 3rd world country??? (Hello - what 3rd world country has the ability to accomplish these tasks? ) I feel that crediting these accusations to "conservatives" or all white males is neither fair or correct. These types of charges clearly reflect an extreme "right-wing" philosophy. If I understand their thinking - then they would have accused Roosevelt of being a socialist too for having created jobs during the Depression rather than let people starve. It appears the right wing group truly feels helping people is never the government's job - we should let them sink.
Political Articles Have No Place on FedSmith
Paralegal Specialist USPS Thu May 14, 2009 9:41 AM
All these articles do is -- once more -- demonstrate that your readership is dominated by reactionary, Right-wing Obama-haters! We can all stipulate to that fact. How about concentrating on the NEWS of interest to Federal employees, which you cover very well and upon which we rely. Thank you.
Re: Political Articles Have No Place on FedSmith
analyst dod Thu May 14, 2009 5:42 PM
There are a LOT of people here who are questioning Obama's decisions, the level of debt his policies are putting our country under along with other real life issues that affect us all. These are legitimate criticisms and deserve discussion. Despite that you try to brush them aside with inflamatory cracks and accusations.
This country is becoming politically polarized and attitudes like yours are a big reason.
Sour Grapes and demographic changes
td off Thu May 14, 2009 10:13 AM
Republicans get 60% of the white vote and according to the new demographic studies that came out only 57% of new babies are white. 60% x 57 = 34%. Republicans get 7% of minority vote so add another 5%. The Republican future numbers are 39% of the electorate. for the next 30 years. Who cares what you think. ADIOS SIONARA lol
Re: Sour Grapes and demographic changes
IT Specialist DOD Thu May 14, 2009 1:21 PM
Yet the vast majority of Americans still say they are fiscally conservative in the National Polling regardless of party affiliation. Democrats have to walk a fine line or they will alienate those voters. It happened in 1994 and it could easily happen in 2010 depending on the unemployement and inflation. Over a million Americans have lost their jobs since January 20, 2009. At some point in time, the honeymoon of "everything is Bush's fault" will soon ring hollow in people's ears while the name Obama will begin to have a steady drum beat. Deficits, Inflation, Unemployement, and taxes is why you should care. If all of them stay high, you might be more TDOFF. :-)))
RE: Obama's Survey
HR Specialist Dept of Homeland Security Thu May 14, 2009 11:08 AM
I can't believe there are still intelligent people in this country that are still saying Obama hasn't produced a valid birth certificate or transcript. Evidently, they don't know anything about background investigations or the vetting process. Who are you and what sand trap has your head been in?
Re: RE: Obama's Survey
BMEU USPS Thu May 14, 2009 1:50 PM
Yeah, it's amazing! They don't seem to notice that the GOP is swirling down the toilet bowl, and it's precisely because of this wingnut obsession with things like the Great Birth Certificate Conspiracy and the incessant, juvenile name-calling. Evidently, there is no moderate voice left on the right...
Re: RE: Obama's Survey
Fed Employee Fed Agency Thu May 14, 2009 1:54 PM
OK. Prove to us he has a thorough background check. And be so kind as to tell exactly HOW he was vetted other than the MSN.
Laughable Analysis By Many
Data Quality DoD Thu May 14, 2009 2:03 PM
I do appreciate the ability of all to say what is on their minds in an open forum some of these comments are just funny to me. President Obama is apparently the Muslim, Socialist, Facist, Anti-Christ, soon-to-be Dictator among other things so opined. I guess all of us in the government will just helplessly stand by as he morphs our government into a 3rd world Socialist Dictatorship Commune or whatever. No other branches of government, nor tens of thousand of Federal employees will be able to stop the onslaught. I guess then that will really prove that he has the supernatural powers that the wingnuts claim he has. Or maybe this is just overheated rhetoric that cannot possibly happen. So sad that politics has just become your team versus my team with a win-at-all-costs mentality. How about some honest debate without the "he's a Socialist and not a citizen" stuff. Let's get real people!
Re: Laughable Analysis By Many
Fed Employee Fed Agency Thu May 14, 2009 2:57 PM
No, we don't think he has supernatural powers. But I do believe that Nov 4, 2008 was the dumbing down of America day. People, he told us he was socialist. He told us he wanted to redistribute the wealth (but not his of course.) He told us he wanted government run health care (and we know it has worked out so well in other nations. NOT) He told us he was going to do Cap and Trade and he stated that it would drive utilities and gas sky high. Didn't you listen. Lower income people won't be able to heat their house or drive to work. You played right into this socialist man's hands.
2 points
Director USDA Fri May 15, 2009 9:09 AM
1. For everyone that is disappointed in the survey questions (I have seen many words printed to state that), where are your survey questions? I get tired of complaining - when are you going to step up and TRY? I don't care which political party you belong, or even if you don't belong.
2. To all of the comments on race - Baaaahhhhh! Yes, it does exist. I have seen it exist more in the ACTIONS of blacks than whites. If you're gonna comment, search your memory first for your actions. I too know of many blacks who voted for him because he was black - that was the only reason. EDUCATE yourself.
It's easy to be an armchair critic. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! - Without anger. Without vitriol. Without hatred.
When you do it, I am anxious to hear the outcomes.
Disapproval of your arrangement of statistics
Div Chief, Robert Merritt Retired Missile Engineer Fri May 29, 2009 8:37 AM
You must have seen the summary statistics on your poll, yet you start of your list of comments with a bunch of those that likes the Obama. Don't inject your own bias into an already established poll of 51% disapproval. Your comments in a summary should reflect the major points as in writing an article, or book. In case you missed it, the disapprovals should start the summary, and follow with the approvals.
Re: Disapproval of your arrangement of statistics
editor FedSmith.com Fri May 29, 2009 8:55 AM
We get complaints from readers every time we do a poll on how the comments are arranged. Since we know we will get complaints regardless of how the comments are arranged, we generally put them in an order that makes sense to us and often different than the previous time we did a poll on the same issue (assuming we have done a previous one). If it makes you feel better, we previously received complaints that we were favoring Sen. McCain for putting comments about him first in an earlier poll.
100 Day Performance Evaluation of President Obama
Financial Analyst U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:41 AM
It takes more than 100 days for a new President to resolve the problems created in 2,920 days by the previous President's administration. There is much to fault, but the blame should be pointed in the direction of the cause, not the cure.
Independent Thought and Fact Verification
Health Insurance Analyst CMS Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:26 AM
In reading the comments from some of the survey participants, I am amazed. How much of what is said is repeated rhetoric? There doesn't sound like independent thought. I encourage everyone to use their resources to verify and validate information heard on TV or radio. There are plenty of fact checking websites.
President Obama
Education Specialist Department of Defense Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:37 AM
What a wonderful well education President. He's done the job of three men in 150-days. Here! Here!
Now To the other commends posted on this blog; review your Roman History....Your time and dates do not apply. Other's negative comments just goes to show how many people do not watch the nightly news broadcasts...You're just old uninformed high school graduates; typical of our public schools; still skipping class and thinking you should have been your school's Validicatorian.
President's performance rating
specialist VA Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:52 PM
I don't put too much faith in any FedSmith polls--the national polls are what count. Lots of whining and criticism from the losers. Grow up and support your new President. Stop the crying. You lost, so face it.
Re: President's performance rating
Supervisor DOA Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:52 PM
His fiscal decisions have been critiqued based upon factual evidence. Don't try to morph that into "whining", that's a partisan stunt.
Obama Performance
Treasury
Wed May 13, 2009 9:24 AM
I can't see anyone rating Obama when he came into office with a host of problems, which consists of bad decisions that were already made by the previous President. He can't clean up this mess overnight, but yet there are so many quick to judge him and they probably say anything when the previous president has been messing for 8 years.
Re: Obama Performance
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 12:13 PM
Polling results
Dept of Navy
Wed May 13, 2009 9:25 AM
Appears the results of this poll is split down the political lines.....democrats and republicans.
Go figure!!!
And why are we doing this at 100 days? Is this a take off the first gulf war? !00 days to liberate Kuwait?
OBAMA OPINION
RETIRED BOP
Wed May 13, 2009 9:25 AM
Full time Federal employmentgives your readers the luxury option of kicking back and viewing unemployment and this recession with Conservative and ambivalent eyes. They have steady incomes and are keeping food on their tables and the mortgage paid. But the country has been in a mess for quite some time. Federal workers only see it thru their 401 K's. The smart ones just transferred everything to the G or F Funds and left them there. I give Obama credit for trying hard. Defintitely more of a concerted effort than his predecessor who's claim to fame was IRAQ. Remember, this just did not happen over night. And it will take years to undo this mess. Fed workers, Just be thankful you have a good job and quit being so critical!!!
Re: OBAMA OPINION
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 1:29 PM
Re: OBAMA OPINION
CBP
Wed May 13, 2009 3:27 PM
It was people just like you who was bascially destroyed anyone who expressed a negative opinion of GW during his first TERM (not 100 days) in office. Look at what happened to the Dixie Chicks, just because a member of that group said she was embarrased to be from the same state as GW. Their career was blown out of the water. But now you people have no qualms making judgement after this President has been in office a little over 100 days.
Re: OBAMA OPINION
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 3:43 PM
CBP
I'm an Indie. The response was to the original poster who basically said that I have a federal job so I need to shut up and color. I guess your political bias allows you to be blinded also. Too bad you are caught up in the political spin cycle. Me? I criticize them all when I disagree with them -- Obama, Bush, Clinton......gasp, even my local politicians. I like to think of myself as the equal opportunity AH. Don't forget the sugar.
President's performance rating
Army
Wed May 13, 2009 9:33 AM
What a surprise. Your readers' evaluation of President Obama's performance almost exactly mirrors your readers' voting in the election. Had this been a formal poll the difference between pre- and post election percentages would be well within the statistical margin of error.
The poll's main showing is that your respondents aren't prepared to change their opinions based on performance, but cling to their preferences regardless of actual results. Put another way, your respondents select the results they evaluate and ignore anything that conflicts with their preconceived beliefs. It's not surprising, but it's also a waste of time.
Survey
USPS
Wed May 13, 2009 9:33 AM
I find it interesting that the national polls almost unanimously give Obama well over 50% approval ratings so far. Since we've just passed the 100 day mark, I would be surprised if the percentage remains that high for 4 years. The point is, most Americans are pleased with what he's done so far.
I've come to the conclusion that Fedsmith.com either has a slightly conservative bias or that the readership leans in that direction - and that's okay as long as folks understand that your survey results are slightly out of step with other surveys asking the same question.
Re: Survey
DFAS
Wed May 13, 2009 1:23 PM
even split
USGS
Wed May 13, 2009 9:35 AM
Lots of polarized people answered this survey, as is usually the case in a non scientific survey.
Slightly more than half voted for mccain and slightly more than half don't like obama.
To get more insight you should have added questions about the previous administration.
How many voted for Bush in 2004?
How many think that was a mistake?
I'd bet you get the same distribution.
Generally people who scream socialist and call names at obama, voted for Bush and won't accept that his 8 years
put this country in the shape it is in now.
This survey made clear to me who reads this web page and not much else. I wonder what the same surveys on FOX and MSNBC would result in.
Re: even split
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 1:34 PM
Re: even split
usgs
Thu May 14, 2009 9:38 AM
How many articles/links on how to fire a Fed, Feds are overpaid, etc does it take to make that clear? I just wonder if this site should be called, Smallergovernmentwithmorecontractorsbutdonttouchmyretifement.com
Just say No
DOE, Albuquerque
Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 AM
This site is full of conservatives, mostly white male professionals, so of course they don't approve of Obama. Loook at how they voted. Toyally out of wack with the USA.The party of No. No health care change, keep Iraqu at war forever, no choice, no gay marriage, no stimulus, no global warming, no science, no evolution, no female equality, no EEO, no birth control .
The result: the party has no minorities, no Control of any region except the confederacy, No republicans in the white house. No control of the House, No control of the senate. and a party made up of 21% of the country There are not enough white male confedreates to control anything. Grow up or or go the way of the whigs, and federalists
Re: Just say No
USDA
Wed May 13, 2009 11:26 AM
Re: Just say No
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 2:04 PM
DOE, Albuquerque
I am a conservative, white male professional (not sure why the initial poster felt it neccessary to use race). I do not agree with the policies of BHO; not because I'm conservative, white or a professional, but because I believe his policies are ill conceived and will be disasterous to this country.
Re: Just say No
DCMA
Wed May 27, 2009 10:58 AM
Give'm a chance
IRS
Wed May 13, 2009 9:39 AM
Obama do not deserve the negative press he has been given. McCain would have not done any better to stimulate the economy. He's only been in place just over a year, give it time. If the last one in office cared, Obama wouldn't have had the pressure of trying to fix this mess....
Re: Give'm a chance
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 12:33 PM
Re: Give'm a chance
Education
Wed May 13, 2009 3:48 PM
It reminds me of an appraisal once. The writer actually stated, "He be good worker."
Reality
DFAS
Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 AM
If we the people of the United States are looking to President Obama to change the outlook of this current economic situation; unfortunately, we are entering into a hope of futility. This will take all Americans working, praying and sacrificing together. We, Americans are to selfish to sacrifice for our brother and sisters. Afterall we care more for our pets than we do the homeless. Lets stop critizing our leaders, start praying for and supporting them through the good and the bad times. They are just fallible human beings; not gods. What made America great was "in God we trust", not in man we trust. It seems as though we have forgotten that.
Your all geniuses
U S Postal Service
Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 AM
Bring on Rush,Newt,Dick all the leaders of the party that got us into the mess were in now.Does anybody really know what socialism is. Cantor and the rest of his friends is what we need with all of their great ideas.Cut taxes don't spend.Cut taxes for 8 years that really save us a ton of money.The rich get richer and the middle class is drowning.
Re: Your all geniuses
Education
Wed May 13, 2009 3:50 PM
Survey on President Obama's Performance so Far
IRS
Wed May 13, 2009 9:43 AM
It is evident that the small portion of Federal Employees who took part in this survey are the same ones who take part in most of the surveys given by this paper. While Obama was running for office the Surveys from ten with the same federal employees responding, said McCain was going to win (in their opinion). Wrong then and just as wrong NOW! Most people who can't or won't see the light for change in this country are just plain out of touch with the world. This is only the begining to many changes in this life time. Get over it and get ready for it. It is just not the presidential elections, our way of life has and is changing and for the better.. Equality is why the real reason why some people can't get with the program, they know who they are, because allot of you will be reading my response.
Re: Survey on President Obama's Performance so Far
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 3:51 PM
ROFLMAO
Bush Administration
Dept of Homeland Security
Wed May 13, 2009 9:44 AM
I can't believe the people that think everything was o.k. with the Bush admin. They must all be blind or crazy. Bush got us in this mess and Obama is doing his best to get us out. After 8 years of Bush, all Republicans need to just shut up and give the Dems their chance. It sure can't be any worse than it has been. And as far as putting our children and grandchildren in debt, this will all be over and done with by then. They'll have a much brighter future under the Dems then they ever could under the Reps. Just think of our children and grandchildren in Irag and Afghanistan, what kind of future is that?
Re: Bush Administration
Commerce
Wed May 13, 2009 3:56 PM
Dept of Homeland Security
"...as far as putting our children and grandchildren in debt, this will all be over and done with by then. They'll have a much brighter future under the Dems then they ever could under the Reps. Just think of our children and grandchildren in Irag and Afghanistan, what kind of future is that?"
Psssst, you apparently have not figured it out yet. But, I'll help you. Our children and grandchildren will be living in a 3rd world country like Iraq and Afghanistan because Obama is spending us into a 3rd world country..
Re: Bush Administration
DOE
Wed May 13, 2009 6:21 PM
Why? The Dems spewed out nasty rhetoric the entire 8 years of the Bush Administration, why should they get a free pass now?
Trying to quell free speech huh....
Anomalous Results
USDA
Wed May 13, 2009 9:48 AM
This was not a scientific survey by any stretch of the imagination. I doubt it even represents the views of most Federal employees.
The President's job approval ratings in poll after poll have been around 67%. That is in stark contrast to the FedSmith poll of self-selected participants--an extremely biased sample by any measure.
Re: Anomalous Results
DoD
Thu May 14, 2009 8:22 AM
Obama Comments
USAF
Wed May 13, 2009 9:49 AM
I wounder if you had also included what you race and age were in the comments would t show a picture. I personally don't like the guy, but we need to give him a chance. He won the vote on young voters with no real life experiance and 99% of the black vote, that almost always vote democrate anyway, but this was "their man". They came down on if you vote against him (which I did) it was a color issue. For me he is very much to the left, he always has been, I'm very much to the right, I always have been. I bet the comments would mostly be young and minoritys supporting him and white,middle class, and older people disapproving of him, just like the election....
President's Performance Evaluation
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 9:57 AM
The human resources clerk from Ft. Campbell, KY must not have been reading the same newspapers, magazines or watching the same TV reports that the rest of the world were looking at. People were excited as in happy about the election of Pres. Obama. I am hearing rumors that a lot of the military bases in the south refuse to post the new President's picture unless Obama actually visits that installation. That sounds like Dereliction of Duty among other things. I should know, I too work for the DoD.
Obamas progress
Defense Logistics Agency
Wed May 13, 2009 10:01 AM
I have read some of the responses submitted by the readers, in my opinion they are mostly biased in both directions. It is far too early to tell if his policies will be effective but extreme times calls for extreme measures, let's just hope they are the correct measures. What Obama is doing, some call socialism, has been done before in difficult times.
The failing banking situation we are in is the result of greed and leveraging in the financial sector designed to create huge profits for the banks has gone unchecked for years, this happened due to poor government regulations. I believe in capitalism, it has helped to make this country great, but when the cat's away the mice will play. Think how many thieves there would be if not for the police.
As a former government employee I also think the readers remarks are basically the result of their prejudice of their own political party lines.
At least it can be said that Obama is not fiddling while Rome burns.
WAT IS HAPPENING TO THIS COUNTRY
FAA
Wed May 13, 2009 10:02 AM
A blind eye is constantly in the forefront. Doen't our politicians see what we are allowing to happen to this country. With our heads buried in the sand, we are increasing our debt, and giving up our freedons. Our constitution is out the window. With out recognizing our current laws, we are coming apart at the seams. Now no one seems to care enough to do anything about it. Trying to get our senators, and representatives to do the right thing, is not happening. Obama, I wish you were the breath of fresh air everyone was talking about! But I think not. We need hjelp right away!
Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
HUD
Wed May 13, 2009 10:03 AM
God help us to survive these four years!!! Where is congress? They were designed to act as a check and balance. They are as far out to lunch (LEFT) as obama!
This seems a little like locking the fox in the hen house.
Re: Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
worker
Wed May 13, 2009 1:06 PM
Re: Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 1:17 PM
Rational thinking about Obama
USDA
Wed May 13, 2009 10:04 AM
Whether I voted for Obama or not is irrelevant now. He is my President because the election process my country uses determined that. I love my country, with all of its imperfections, and I support my President. That said, although I approve of his willingness to move assertively to take on the big issues and am hopeful his leadership will be successful, I am skeptical and withhold my approval until I see more tangible results of success. He is still setting things in motion, and the results are several months, even years away from being rationally evaluated.
Obama Performance Evaluation comments
Department of Health and Human Services
Wed May 13, 2009 10:07 AM
Many commenters/voters unfortunately latch onto words like "socialist" without actually understanding or caring about their true meaning. To be socialist is to believe in redistributing the wealth. What is the role of the Federal government, but to collect the taxes in a central location and redistribute the money to the states and pay for other federal priorities, which the taxpayer may or may not approve of. The Government has been doing this for years - redistributing the wealth from those of us who work to those of us who don't for whatever reason. Unless, voters want to change our system of government then I would expect them to go along with the current situation and try to have an impact on those issues and programs that they believe should or should not be funded and stop crying about words like "socialism" that they truly don't understand.
About What You'd Expect
DCMA
Wed May 13, 2009 10:10 AM
Although I didn't bother with this poll, I'm somehow reassured by the split. At this point, I'd prefer a President who is willing to take the risks that would displease a large segment of the FedSmith respondents who are, as a group, more to the right than the country as a whole. This is someone who has beliefs and is willing to lead - whether you like the direction he is going or not. Give him a chance - there's a big mess to be cleaned up & it won't be resolved in 100 days or six months.
F for FAILURE!!!!
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 10:22 AM
What is it about Obama that makes people ignore his imcompetence? Is it his looks? His education? His personality? His "way with words?" It just boggles my mind! One would think this admnistration was the second coming of Christ! What will it take for people to realize the America of 101 days ago will be totally unrecognizable in 3 1/2 more years? It scare me to death!
Re: F for FAILURE!!!!
worker
Wed May 13, 2009 1:14 PM
boy am I glad this quote was not used on the last president. sounds funny when you throw in bush instead of obama, but in fact it was terribly true and devastating for this country
Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
Bee
Wed May 13, 2009 10:23 AM
Socialism is the government ownwership of business all the time. Not just when we are just trying to help. There is only one socialist country (Venezuela) Libralism is the establishment of government social programs to create a strong middle class. Liberalism believes that middle classes are created by government institutions. Otherwise you end up with a Venezuela because there is no middle class and the top 1% owns 89% of everything. So Republicans be careful with your language or they may start calling you Elitist, Racist and Nazi's, since there is elements of truth in your conservative movement as there are elements of truth in the Liberal movement that relates to socialism
Re: Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 1:42 PM
Re: Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
off
Wed May 13, 2009 2:57 PM
Re: Sociaism and liberalism. Get it right
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 7:18 PM
we are Losing our Liberty
DHS
Wed May 13, 2009 10:37 AM
Watching Mr. Obama ruin this country in front of my watching eyes is horrible. Spending is out of control. It's a power grab by the liberals. I am sick of him and Wanda Sikes.
Biased sampling but accurate readership profile
GSA
Wed May 13, 2009 10:39 AM
That your results are out of step with various public scientific polls is not surprising given that yours is a conservative-based publication with a tilted rightist leaning readership. You Grand Ole Partier's didn't really think you were fooling anybody, did you? Now lets have a poll of your writing and editorial staff. Come on... what are your party affiliations? Prove me wrong while letting a little sunlight in.
Obama Job Performance
NIH
Wed May 13, 2009 10:44 AM
Seems to me that the people who are worried about the burden on our granchildren are missing one important thing. If we don't pay the bill now to feed, cloth, educate and ensure they and their parents have a home - there's no chance they'll be able to survive much less "take on the burden of the future".
Time for outreach
Outside the Beltway
Wed May 13, 2009 10:55 AM
As these numbers reflect a much more conservative bent than the nation and government as a whole, it seems as if FedSmith should be working to broaden its audience. The many columns addressing how Feds are overpaid, disciplining employees and upending their unions may be taking its toll on "blue" readers. Your readership's demographic might be of interest as an adjunct to these numbers.
Voters & Ethics
BIA
Wed May 13, 2009 11:03 AM
In my lifetime there has been no administration with a lower set of ethical standards. The election of President Obama demonstrates that uneducated voters will elect a "Rock Star" regardless of the person's lack of experience. This administration is way beyond its "Peter Pricnciple" level of competence. But he does speak well as long as the teleprompter is working.
Re: Voters & Ethics
Bee
Wed May 13, 2009 11:35 AM
Re: Voters & Ethics
Outside the Beltway
Wed May 13, 2009 11:36 AM
Q: And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?
Rumsfeld, May 30, 2003: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around
Re: Voters & Ethics
DON
Thu May 14, 2009 11:23 AM
You make a huge deal of the deaths of our servicemen in the service of their country (which it is, of course). Yet 40,000 or more will lose their life on our highways this year alone, just like last year and the countless years before.
Where's the huge outcry for the senseless loss of life?
Most of those deaths were caused by things within our control...
Drinking, seat belts, inattention, sleeping, speeding, etc, etc. Where's the outrage?
The number of servicemens deaths is even smaller when you look at it over the several years of this war.
Before you all get on your high horses, my nephew died in Iraq in the Army. I know he died in service to his country and that he made a difference. I couldn't be prouder of him than my own son who's in the air force.
I'm not belittling his death or any one elses. It's tragic, and I miss him terribly. But there are far worse ways to go in my mind.
The Unmaking of America
U.S. EPA
Wed May 13, 2009 11:07 AM
President Obama made the "Unmaking of America" his goal clear from the beginning of his campaign. He is going to change America, i.e. "Unmake America." He is going to destroy the basic fiber of our being and make us a socialist country. His street organizing is learned from his Chicago days - "instill fear, change the rules and do what you want before the people have chance to realize what happened" is right on target. He will nationalize everything and give the unions unprecedented power. The true taxpayers of America and our children will regret the day we elected this president. If you read his books ywith an open mind you will understand he does not like America. He is making that fact very clear to the world. He has never hidden his agenda, many Americans just bought into it. Why not - give me more and expect me to contribute less, I'll elect you again and again.
Obama
USPS
Wed May 13, 2009 11:08 AM
I'm very impressed with the current President's direction. At least he's doing - something. The former screwups of the previous administration's pocket lining and family revenge have left us all frustrated and hanging with no end in sight. Obama is moving forward, even though the right now isn't pretty, maybe we will become a nation the world can be proud of in the future - after we pay off the debt that Bush borrowed to fund his pet projects.
Obama's Survey
USDA
Wed May 13, 2009 11:08 AM
I have mixed feelings about Pres.Obama's performance in office. I agree that we needed get out from under the last 8 years of the Bush Admin. However, I think Obama is trying to do too much at once. He needs to concentrate on the economic problems of this country and how it impacts the little guy not big business. Why aren't the banks that received money under ARRA 2009 being forced to help keep people in their home by refinancing their loans to affordable interest rate? It would make more sense than having all these foreclosed homes in inventory. Also force the lenders to lower the interest rate on credit cards. The 2nd thing is the war in Iraq & Afghanistan - we need to end those as quickly as possible - it has cost too much in terms of money and American lives. I also don't understand the relunctancy on Obama part to release records about himself - birth certificate, college transcripts, etc. What is he hiding?
FedSmith Readers
USDA
Wed May 13, 2009 11:26 AM
If it wasn't for the important articles that are aimed at Federal workers, I would never visit this site. The comments are usually filled with hateful rigth-wing talking points. This really comes out when there's an article or poll such as this one about President Obama or about equality of benefits for Gay & Lesbian employees.
Re: FedSmith Readers
dod agency
Wed May 13, 2009 11:55 AM
Wait...
Veterans Affairs
Wed May 13, 2009 11:37 AM
23 people aren't sure who they voted for? Scary...
Obama Administration survey
Social Security admin
Wed May 13, 2009 11:42 AM
I have read the survey comments in this article. At this point, i am neither for or against our President's actions or his administration. I am giving it time to see what the efforts of his administration do for our country and our economy. How can we judge the efforts so early in the game? It took 8 years or longer perhaps for our country to get to the bad shape it is in today, so what makes us think or better yet, what qualifies us to rush into judgement so soon? Some actions that our president is taking may seem haste or not well thought of; however, maybe in the long run those same actions may prove otherwise. Americans, give it time. Be patient.
Comments about POTUS' Performance
U.S. DOT
Wed May 13, 2009 11:42 AM
I had no idea that there were so many Republican government employees, since I have always heard that they spit on government and its programs. If most of them despise President Obama and his programs, why don't they quit in large numbers, use their expertise, and go to work for private industry. Let people who are real public servants have their jobs.
I never heard them complain when the former administration and its cronies were robbing the government blind, getting us into the worst economic turndown since WWII, fighting two unnecessary wars, and replacing government jobs with millions of contractors for no apparent reason.
Re: Comments about POTUS' Performance
DoD
Wed May 13, 2009 12:55 PM
Re: Comments about POTUS' Performance
worker
Wed May 13, 2009 1:31 PM
Obama's Job Performance
U S Postal Service
Wed May 13, 2009 12:00 PM
In reading negative comments, I see they are exactly the same as the rhetoric posted by McCain supporters on You.Tube. They were sour grapes then as they are now. Obama won. Get over it! The socialism rhetoric and inept acts of trying to instill this baseless fear is absolutely ridiculous and no one's buying it... not even you! President Obama has managed to secure respect for America in the World. Even America's enemies are pausing to watch and reaccess their positions. The economy is slowly taking a turn for the better. It will take time to clean up this mess. He told us that, and we're willing to give him the time he needs. People are not only feeling more hopeful but are volunterring to assist one another as never before. This man is smart and has surrounded himself with the very best minds and qualifications available. So either support him, or just sit back and enjoy the ride. This fear moungering serves no purpose other then to divide. America is sick of it We're beyond it.
Re: Obama's Job Performance
dod agency
Wed May 13, 2009 12:09 PM
Re: Obama's Job Performance
DOI
Wed May 13, 2009 2:23 PM
The Democrats were afraid that the Republicans and the majority of the taxpayers who will be paying for this accumulated debt for decades, WOULD find out what was in that bill, and then it might not pass, even with the Democratic majority. I consider myself an Independent and I am greatly disappointed with both the D's and the R's. Our current path (started by Bush and the R's) and kicked into overdrive by Obama and the D's will bring this country to ruin, and result in a stagnant economy for a very long time if the voters don't significantly reduce the size and power of our Federal Government!!!!
President Score Card
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 12:17 PM
Great job! Mr. President Baraack Obama you could've choosen any other career but you choose to help the American people in the widest disemination possible. I applaud your very effort to stand up for all people against the tolls and evils of society to try and help the elderly, the sick, and the downtrodden so that we as America can stand. If we don't stand for something we circum to evil nations that will be glad to come in America and rule, thus changing America as we know, to a communistic rule. My hat goes off to you sir as a Public Servent. I say Thank You if no one else will.
Readers Give President a Performance Evaluation
USAF
Wed May 13, 2009 12:25 PM
It's only been 115 days or so since the man was inaugurated, for Pete's sake! None of you 'antis' want to give the guy a chance because, if he succeeds, he'll have refuted everything you believe in. Where were you people when Bush was trampling all over the Constitution, in the name of national security & war powers? Where were you when Bush was sole-sourcing & outsourcing everything to his Ktr benefactors & spending hundreds of billions in Iraq? Where were you when the richest 1% of this country ran the banking system & Wall Street into the ground? It is obvious to me, after reading these comments, that the country is almost irrepairably divided. Perhaps all the haters-because that is exactly what they are: anti-everything that isn't white or 'faith-based' should move on down to that new land of opportunity: Texas, where Gov Perry is saying Texas should secede. Interesting that the only bastion the Republican/Libertarians have left is the old Confederacy! Get thee hence!
President a Performance Evaluation
cant say
Wed May 13, 2009 12:43 PM
If you are black it wouldn't matter if BO was a Felon, that would think he was the greatest thing since sliced bread. Look at the foremore Mayors of DC and Detroit. Basically birds of a feather,, those that are truely uneducated other than being a BO look alike, flock together.
Re: President a Performance Evaluation
USPS
Wed May 13, 2009 1:10 PM
Re: President a Performance Evaluation
DOD
Thu May 14, 2009 7:23 AM
truly appalling
dod agency
Wed May 13, 2009 1:00 PM
What I find truly appalling is the cavalier, antagonistic, and sometimes hateful manner with which some readers dismiss the concerns of others. Kudos to this site for publishing all points of view--including those among my colleagues who seem to think the definition of political debate is "agree with me or be damned."
We are taking on debt in the trillions with no apparent way to pay for it--at the same time our Medicare and Social Security systems are going to go bankrupt. We are raising taxes (on the "rich" allegedly) and we know more taxes are going to hit all of us on energy, and probably a national sales tax of 7 - 10% as we try to pay for the massive programs that may, or may not, have any impact.
These are valid concerns. Those that dismiss them as "anti" or "racist" or other pejorative terms seem designed to force everyone to have the same political beliefs as the person posting the comment. They are no better than the secret police in a dictatorship that forces conformity.
We should have concerns about ignoring our constitution (see: chrysler bailout) and unbelievable govt. spending. Instead of shouting at those who are concerned, try to pay attention and engage in civil discourse instead of ranting and name-calling.
OBAMA Rating
IRS
Wed May 13, 2009 1:27 PM
Do we have to spend the next four years stroking this narcissus ego who is continually telling terrorist countries how sorry he is about how the american people behave? My vote is Impeach him before the government has control of every business and has completly given away the farm. I heard this morning coming to work that his latest inititive will make it more difficult for illegal immigrents to obtain employment but easier for them to get welfare. That really made my day.
Re: OBAMA Rating
Outside the Beltway
Wed May 13, 2009 5:01 PM
President Obama's Rating by Feds
Social Security administration
Wed May 13, 2009 2:21 PM
It is clear that McCain suporters were more eager to participate.
Obviously there is a big diference in perspective.
I myself see no reason to disaprove. I believe this country is better than when he took over and we keep improving.
Re: President Obama's Rating by Feds
DOE
Wed May 13, 2009 5:39 PM
A general statement of "I believe this country is better" means nothing unless you tell us the rationale, the evidence you're basing your statement on. A general statement with no specifics can be interpreted any way a reader wants to interpret it.
SOCIALISM DEFINED
off
Wed May 13, 2009 3:00 PM
Socialism in political thought refers to economic theories of social organization advocating collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equality for all individuals, with an egalitarian method of compensation.[1][2] Modern socialism originated in the late 19th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticized the effects of industrialization and private ownership on society. Karl Marx posited that socialism (the disappearance of class and therefore state) would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution after a transitional stage from capitalism called the dictatorship of the proletariat.
socialism
USDA Forest Service
Wed May 13, 2009 3:03 PM
Obama is inexperienced in economic policy, military policy, financial policy, and foreign policy. It is highly doubtful that he is even a citizen of our great country....which may be why he is not concerned about taking away our freedoms, spending money we don't have, increasing government roles in our private lives, burdening our grandchildren with a debt they won't be able to pay, and inviting terrorists to negotiate with us. The issue of illegal immigration has been in the background, but considering the speed with which his 'changes' have been implemented, I'm sure it's soon to come to the forefront. God help us....we need it.
President's Performance Rating
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 3:24 PM
As I wrote when you first published your “performance” survey, what your gave the readers is not a performance survey but a “like/dislike” survey. The majority of the comments prove my point. To measure someone’s performance you must have a rating plan with meaningful and measureable performance elements. I must say that I know of no place in either the public or private sector where what you published would pass for a performance rating plan or where its results would survive a third party review. Your results can be validate as opinions not as performance ratings.
Re: President's Performance Rating
dod agency
Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 PM
Perhaps those that took the survey understood the question anyway. One can obviously argue if it should be labeled "performance" or not. Or, in reality, no one really cares since we all understood the question and really don't care if it fits into a definition under 5 CFR or some such. But, if it makes you feel better, whine away and continue to display your superior knowledge and ownership of the word "performance."
Re: President's Performance Rating
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 9:21 PM
Intolerance is Unfortunate
dod agency
Wed May 13, 2009 3:24 PM
It appears that there cannot be a poll such as this with a wide diversity of views being expressed without incurring wrath and rancor. That is too bad. A rational discussion of the issues would be helpful. Comments that appear to try and intimidate other people doesn't accomplish much except generate a similar counter. That appears to be the state of our political discourse in the country; not just here but in general in our media.
The relative small difference between this survey and national polls does not surprise me. Federal employees are well-off. We have very good benefits, job security and relatively high pay compared to the average American. We like to think of ourselves as in the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum for some reason but the reality is otherwise.
Many of my colleagues in the DC area have 2 incomes and make over $250,000 per year. They will be hit by higher taxes, along with taxes on electricity, AMT, etc. All of us will pay more. Many readers here will pay considerably more in taxes and possibly have a less well-off retirement as a result.
Blaming the site doesn't for printing comments from readers doesn't make much sense. I hear these comments every day; the difference is that the comments are in the public eye for everyone to see and free from intimidation. We are smart people; we know what we are supposed to think and we say what we are supposed to think. What we really think is oftentimes considerably different. It is unique to be able to read the comments that are posted here as a result.
Obama's performance
USDA (retired)
Wed May 13, 2009 4:03 PM
Of course this is not a random sample. In surveys like this the people most satisfied (with Obama in this case) and displeased are most motivated to respond.
But during my time in the federal service I did note that a lot of die-hard conservatives held positions of importance and exercised perhaps undue (as distinct from balanced) influence over agency policy. New ideas and approaches were difficult to introduce, let along implement. And individuals who sided with their supervisors were most apt to be promoted.
Lack of Knowledge Exhibited by Federal Employees
Department of the Interior
Wed May 13, 2009 4:22 PM
Wow! Thanks for publishing a summary of reader comments concerning President Obama's performance. I cannot believe how ignorant your conservative readers are about what needs to be done in the United States. Of course, I shouldn't be surprised as the Republicans have advanced no ideas and instead choose to cast blame on those that are doing their best to solve the nation's problems. I bet your conservative readers love their Federal pensions (with annual COLAs) and guranteed heath insurance at affordable costs (including access to Medicare), but do they want other Americans to have these benefits along with the job security they have enjoyed? I think not! They've gotten (or have) their's - now it's time to criticize anyone who would dare to address the problems created by the Bush legacy.
Richard Scott
President Obama Approval
Treasury Dept.
Wed May 13, 2009 4:34 PM
President Obama is doing a great job. Its crazy to think he can fix eight years of Bush mess in four months. He has done more in trying to get this economy fixed in 4 months than Bush did in 8 years. Most of the negative reponses to Obama are evidently McCain supporters and they can't find anything positive that Obama has done and never will find anything positive. In their eyes only a Republican can get high marks regardless of how well the person performs. I'm just looking forward to Obama tackling this economy problem and coming up with positive resolutions. This is a messed up economy and all blessings go out to President Obama as he continues to tackle the problems.
Obama Negativity
DOD
Wed May 13, 2009 5:22 PM
I just can't believe that my "Brother" Federal Employees, 51 % of them disapprove with Obama's first few months! I realize that not everyone thinks the same but come on!!! I personally don't believe you can give an accurate measurement of the man until at least a year has passed us by. This first 100 day rating period showed us that the man can do more than one thing at the same time, can speak eloquently and make us understand the reasons why he is doing what he is doing and he is taking the time to tell us about it. And people are complaining about that!!! One thing I am thankful about is that I don't have to look at that nasty little smirk the other guy used to give us at his press conferences!!! Not to mention the arrogant way he spoke. No wonder we are regarded in a much lower light world wide. At least Obama is putting forth the effort to try to change the way other world leaders think of us. To call our newly elected officials "Crooks" and to call our Government a "Gangster or Socialist Government" is unfair and IGNORANT!!!! The man has taken office in the midst of an economic melt down, a war in Afganistan and Iraq (which he didn't get us into) and is putting forth an honest effort to rectify the situiation that was left to him. Give the man some real time to straighten out these probems, then if he doesn't meet your expectations then you can throw the first stone!!!
Re: Obama Negativity
Fed Govt
Thu May 14, 2009 4:30 PM
Re: Obama Negativity
DFAS
Fri May 15, 2009 7:40 AM
Re: Obama Negativity
Army
Fri May 15, 2009 4:49 PM
Re: Obama Negativity
TSO
Fri May 15, 2009 6:33 PM
In the big picture it's too soon to judge Obama's performance.
His most fanatical backers have been proclaiming that he's one of the best presidents ever, even saying that before he took office.
His most fanatical critics have called him a rabid socialist who will spend this country into the stone ages.
Both of these positions are emotionally biased and way too extreme to be seriously considered.
If we want to discuss this intelligently we need to get away from characterizing the man and instead examine the policies that are being put into place. When enough time has passed to observe the long term effects of these decisions then we can judge his performance.
The Non-President President
US Army
Wed May 13, 2009 6:21 PM
The country is getting exactly what they deserve, 1984. The dawning of the one party government, like in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela and Cuba.
President Obama
IRS
Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 PM
What can you say of people who would rather vote for an uneducated felon than a well educated, personable thinking man simply because of the color of his skin. America has finally moved into the 21st century however several generations have not.
Disapproval of President Obama's job !
DPALS
Thu May 14, 2009 7:55 AM
President Obama is the most dangerous president we have had in office. He has held hands with all our enemies, Russia, Iran, China, etc. They will always be our enemies. We can not turn our backs on them or disarm our country. He is also trying to break the country finiancially with all this giving of money away.
If he gets control of the banks hello! dictator. Also this country was founded on Christian principles and if we step away from that be ready for God's jugements to start. We are just on the edge of His judgement.
Obama Job Performance
Internal Revenue Service
Thu May 14, 2009 8:22 AM
As a conservative, I disapprove of the job performance of President Obama. I would like to have seen that Corporate america be allowed to file bankruptcywithout any type of bailout. The stimulus bills only add to the mounting deficits that the US government is spending more than they can possibly pay back in our lifetime and stretches into the lives of our grandchildren and great grandchildren. Tax cuts for the highest taxpayers would generate more jobs for the private sector and we are cutting off their incentive to do so.
Re: Obama Job Performance
Universe
Thu May 14, 2009 10:31 AM
Obama Job Performance
NIH
Thu May 14, 2009 9:39 AM
The President has gone after the banks with their under-handed credit card practices, and the loan sharks posing as mortgage lenders, given a small amount to retirees quickly - and that's seen as his trying to turn America into a 3rd world country??? (Hello - what 3rd world country has the ability to accomplish these tasks? ) I feel that crediting these accusations to "conservatives" or all white males is neither fair or correct. These types of charges clearly reflect an extreme "right-wing" philosophy. If I understand their thinking - then they would have accused Roosevelt of being a socialist too for having created jobs during the Depression rather than let people starve. It appears the right wing group truly feels helping people is never the government's job - we should let them sink.
Political Articles Have No Place on FedSmith
USPS
Thu May 14, 2009 9:41 AM
All these articles do is -- once more -- demonstrate that your readership is dominated by reactionary, Right-wing Obama-haters! We can all stipulate to that fact. How about concentrating on the NEWS of interest to Federal employees, which you cover very well and upon which we rely. Thank you.
Re: Political Articles Have No Place on FedSmith
dod
Thu May 14, 2009 5:42 PM
This country is becoming politically polarized and attitudes like yours are a big reason.
Sour Grapes and demographic changes
off
Thu May 14, 2009 10:13 AM
Republicans get 60% of the white vote and according to the new demographic studies that came out only 57% of new babies are white. 60% x 57 = 34%. Republicans get 7% of minority vote so add another 5%. The Republican future numbers are 39% of the electorate. for the next 30 years. Who cares what you think. ADIOS SIONARA lol
Re: Sour Grapes and demographic changes
DOD
Thu May 14, 2009 1:21 PM
RE: Obama's Survey
Dept of Homeland Security
Thu May 14, 2009 11:08 AM
I can't believe there are still intelligent people in this country that are still saying Obama hasn't produced a valid birth certificate or transcript. Evidently, they don't know anything about background investigations or the vetting process. Who are you and what sand trap has your head been in?
Re: RE: Obama's Survey
USPS
Thu May 14, 2009 1:50 PM
Re: RE: Obama's Survey
Fed Agency
Thu May 14, 2009 1:54 PM
Laughable Analysis By Many
DoD
Thu May 14, 2009 2:03 PM
I do appreciate the ability of all to say what is on their minds in an open forum some of these comments are just funny to me. President Obama is apparently the Muslim, Socialist, Facist, Anti-Christ, soon-to-be Dictator among other things so opined. I guess all of us in the government will just helplessly stand by as he morphs our government into a 3rd world Socialist Dictatorship Commune or whatever. No other branches of government, nor tens of thousand of Federal employees will be able to stop the onslaught. I guess then that will really prove that he has the supernatural powers that the wingnuts claim he has. Or maybe this is just overheated rhetoric that cannot possibly happen. So sad that politics has just become your team versus my team with a win-at-all-costs mentality. How about some honest debate without the "he's a Socialist and not a citizen" stuff. Let's get real people!
Re: Laughable Analysis By Many
Fed Agency
Thu May 14, 2009 2:57 PM
2 points
USDA
Fri May 15, 2009 9:09 AM
1. For everyone that is disappointed in the survey questions (I have seen many words printed to state that), where are your survey questions? I get tired of complaining - when are you going to step up and TRY? I don't care which political party you belong, or even if you don't belong.
2. To all of the comments on race - Baaaahhhhh! Yes, it does exist. I have seen it exist more in the ACTIONS of blacks than whites. If you're gonna comment, search your memory first for your actions. I too know of many blacks who voted for him because he was black - that was the only reason. EDUCATE yourself.
It's easy to be an armchair critic. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! - Without anger. Without vitriol. Without hatred.
When you do it, I am anxious to hear the outcomes.
Disapproval of your arrangement of statistics
Retired Missile Engineer
Fri May 29, 2009 8:37 AM
You must have seen the summary statistics on your poll, yet you start of your list of comments with a bunch of those that likes the Obama. Don't inject your own bias into an already established poll of 51% disapproval. Your comments in a summary should reflect the major points as in writing an article, or book. In case you missed it, the disapprovals should start the summary, and follow with the approvals.
Re: Disapproval of your arrangement of statistics
FedSmith.com
Fri May 29, 2009 8:55 AM
100 Day Performance Evaluation of President Obama
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:41 AM
It takes more than 100 days for a new President to resolve the problems created in 2,920 days by the previous President's administration. There is much to fault, but the blame should be pointed in the direction of the cause, not the cure.
Independent Thought and Fact Verification
CMS
Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:26 AM
In reading the comments from some of the survey participants, I am amazed. How much of what is said is repeated rhetoric? There doesn't sound like independent thought. I encourage everyone to use their resources to verify and validate information heard on TV or radio. There are plenty of fact checking websites.
President Obama
Department of Defense
Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:37 AM
What a wonderful well education President. He's done the job of three men in 150-days. Here! Here!
Now To the other commends posted on this blog; review your Roman History....Your time and dates do not apply. Other's negative comments just goes to show how many people do not watch the nightly news broadcasts...You're just old uninformed high school graduates; typical of our public schools; still skipping class and thinking you should have been your school's Validicatorian.
President's performance rating
VA
Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:52 PM
I don't put too much faith in any FedSmith polls--the national polls are what count. Lots of whining and criticism from the losers. Grow up and support your new President. Stop the crying. You lost, so face it.
Re: President's performance rating
DOA
Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:52 PM