Employee Claims He 'Previously Worked as a Psychic'

By on January 29, 2012 in Court Cases, News

In Kennington v. Merit Systems Protection Board, CAFC No. 2011-3192 (nonprecedential), 12/13/11, the appeals court rejected a fired IRS Supervisory Data Transcriber’s claim that he was retaliated against for whistleblowing.

The court’s opinion recounts what many would view as odd behavior: “Early in his employment, Mr. Kennington attended an introductory meeting with other employees during which he claimed that he had previously worked as a psychic; that he could communicate with angels, God, and Jesus; that he had visions; that he was a very religious person; and that he was not married.” (p. 2)

His bosses then told him not to discuss such topics with other employees. A few months later, Kennington sent emails to the Internal Revenue Service criminal unit naming several companies—including a former employer—that he “believed” were dodging taxes or doing other illegal things. (p. 2) He claims he sent a copy of that email to his supervisor a few weeks later and complained that he was being “harassed and discriminated against in various ways, including by being prohibited from discussing his religious beliefs with other employees.” (p. 2)

The next day Kennington was fired because of “inappropriate behavior and disruptive comments…” citing three specifications.

Kennington turned to the Office of Special Counsel saying that he had been fired because of his emails to the IRS criminal investigations unit. The OSC looked into it, but closed its file because he did not respond to its requests for more information. Kennington then turned to the Merit Systems Protection Board with what is called an “Individual right of appeal” (IRA) contending violations of the Whistleblower Protection Act. (pp. 2-3)

The MSPB found it had no jurisdiction and the appeals court now agrees. Kennington apparently tripped up by not pursuing his claims with the OSC. Further, his so-called whistleblowing involved private entities and not any governmental bodies and thus were not covered by the WPA.  The court also turned aside Kennington’s claims concerning agency violations of his constitutional protections of speech and religion since these claims to not fall within IRA appeals.

Kennington v. Merit Systems Protection Board

© 2016 Susan McGuire Smith. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from Susan McGuire Smith.

Tags:

About the Author

Susan McGuire Smith spent most of her federal legal career with NASA, serving as Chief Counsel at Marshall Space Flight Center for 14 years. Her expertise is in government contracts, ethics, and personnel law.

10 Replies

Comments RSS

  1. Management Attorney says:

    Did he meant to say he was psychotic?

  2. Bill T. says:

    Meanwhile the million dollar challenge to anyone that can demonstrate psychic ability goes unclaimed. It’s not that hard, demonstrate the ability in an environment that precludes cheating, you get the money.

  3. Fed Up! says:

    How come psychics never see it coming?

  4. lazycs says:

    Another example of why all MSPB and EEO suits should require loser pays. CS lose 98% of all these cases

    • Old Fed says:

      Once again, you show your total lack of knowledge of how Civl Service actually operates. The loser DOES pay his/her own attorney fees. In fact, the loser is often required to pay not only their own fees, but that of the agency.

    • James70094 says:

      CS loses 98%? How is that possible, when you argue that CS have jobs for life?

  5. Retired VA Psychologist says:

    Perhaps he was discriminated against because he held unusual religious or spiritual beliefs.  But evidently there is no evidence of this… 

  6. Jd123 says:

    And this is newsworthy why?

Top