Senators Propose Senate Rules Change to Look for Duplicate Government Programs

By on June 29, 2011 in Current Events with 3 Comments

U.S. Senators Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK), Mark Udall (D-CO), Rand Paul (R-KY), and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced an amendment Wednesday that would require all legislation to be reviewed before it is considered by the Senate to prevent the creation of duplicative and overlapping government programs.

In March, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report identifying hundreds of duplicative and overlapping programs costing approximately $217 billion a year.  GAO stated “reducing or eliminating duplication, overlap, or fragmentation could potentially save billions of taxpayer dollars annually and help agencies provide more efficient and effective services.”  GAO found 47 separate job training programs, 88 economic development programs, 82 teacher quality programs, and 56 financial literacy programs.  Despite GAO’s findings, Congress has been slow to address this problem.

“Congress creates hundreds of new programs every year, adding to the thousands that already exist.  Every time we create a new program that duplicates an existing program, taxpayers end up footing the bill for both programs.  At a time when our $14 trillion debt has become our greatest national security threat, that is an absolute embarrassment.  No family in America would handle their finances in such a haphazard and careless manner.  Creating new programs may seem more politically popular than reviewing existing programs.  Yet, I am convinced the American people are demanding the kind of common sense oversight and stewardship of their tax dollars this bill calls for.  I’m pleased many of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle agree,” Dr. Coburn said.

“Americans have made it clear that they want Washington to start living within its means and to take all the necessary steps to cut spending. At the very least, we can all agree that wasteful or duplicative government programs that cost money ought to be a good starting point on the long, hard road ahead. Preventing future duplications is just as important as getting rid of the redundancy that already exists,” Claire McCaskill said.

Specifically, this bipartisan amendment would require committee reports accompanying every bill to provide the following:

  • An analysis by the Congressional Research Service to determine if the bill creates any new federal program, office, or initiative that would duplicate or overlap any existing federal program, office, or initiative with similar mission, purpose, goals, or activities along with a listing of all of the overlapping or duplicative federal program or programs, office or offices, or initiative or initiatives; and
  • An explanation provided by the committee as to why the creation of each new program, office, or initiative is necessary if a similar program or programs, office or offices, or initiative or initiatives already exist.

© 2016 FedSmith.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from FedSmith.com.

Top