In an undated letter sent to federal retirees (and received
last week by a retiree who brought it to my attention), William Zielinski, the
Associate Director of Retirement Operations for OPM, had good things to say
about the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program.
Among his statements were:
“As a federal retiree, no doubt you
are keeping a close eye on your finances and making every effort to protect
your hard-earned savings through your retirement years. That is why we want to make sure you are
aware of a program that can help provide protection against the high costs of
long term care.”
“The good news is that you can
protect yourself – and your income and assets – with coverage from the Federal
Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP). Once you are enrolled, it can help pay for long term care you receive in
your home, in an assisted living facility, nursing home, or in other settings.”
“The FLTCIP is underwritten by John
Hancock Life & Health Insurance Company, and oversight for the program is
provided by the U. S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).”
On the other hand, the following items have been in the news
regarding long-term care and long-term care insurance over the last year or so.
early 2010 John Hancock, after having received approval from OPM, raised
federal long term care insurance premiums by as much as 25% for those who had enrolled in FLTCIP during the initial open
In her October 14, 2009 testimony to Congress about the pending rate
hike, NARFE President Margaret L. Baptiste stated: “In
2002 when FLTCIP was launched, eligible individuals were assured that the
program would have ‘premium stability.’ The likelihood of a rate
hike was downplayed in promotional materials”
Later in her remarks while
discussing the future of FLTCIP, she went on to say: “A long-term care
insurance program with a 25 percent rate hike — where premium increases were
marketed as unlikely – is a much tougher sell. No one wants to be burned
again. NARFE is put in the position of wanting to encourage our
members to plan for their future, while having great difficulty recommending a
product whose premiums are not necessarily predictable or affordable.”
- In September of 2010, as reported in the National Underwriter John Hancock
announced that it would ask state insurance regulators for permission to
increase premiums by an average of 40%
for most of its policy holders. Though
this rate hike will not apply to current FLTCIP enrollees, anyone who can do
the math can see that there is a 15% gap
between the increase Hancock and OPM imposed on federal enrollees and what Hancock
is seeking from state insurance regulators. What this will mean when the current FLTCIP contract comes up for
renewal is anyone’s guess.
- In September of 2010, also according to the National Underwriter, Hancock was
suspending sales of new group LTC products.
- In November of 2010, MetLife (one of the
original FLTCIP insurance providers) announced it would halt the sale of new
long-term care insurance policies.
- Marianne Harrison, president of John Hancock
Long-Term Care Insurance was quoted in the January 2011 edition of Kiplinger’s Retirement Report: “This
won’t be a viable product if we do not have sufficient funds to pay claims in
the long term.”
- In the article referenced in the previous
bullet, a financial planner stated that he advises clients to expect a 30% to
40% rate increase for long-term care insurance at some point in the future.
What does this mean to federal employees and retirees who
are considering purchasing long-term care insurance?
One thing it means is that LTC insurance is
still in a state of flux. Employees and
retirees should consider their likelihood of needing such coverage. They should also do their homework and
investigate the costs and benefits of LTC coverage extensively before investing
in any coverage (either FLTCIP or a private policy).