OPM Proposes Changes to Federal Employee Removal Process
OPM has issued a proposed rule to enable faster removal of federal employees in different situations.
OPM has issued a proposed rule to enable faster removal of federal employees in different situations.
The author says that while extending the probationary period for federal employees is a popular proposal, it is really not needed.
The MSPB has found that the probationary period is not extensively used, but there are steps agencies can take to utilize it more effectively.
On January 16, 1883, the Civil Service Commission was created. Federal employment has changed but the bureaucracy and much of the original philosophy still exist.
The MSPB found in a recent survey that barriers exist which cause federal managers not to fully utilize employee probationary periods to deal with non-performers.
The House has passed a bill that would double the length of the probationary period for new federal employees.
A bill has been favorably reported by committee to significantly increase the length of a probationary period for a federal employee.
Legislation has been introduced that would extend the probationary period for new federal employees to two years. Would this benefit new employees?
The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) has asked the House of Representatives’ Oversight and Government Reform Committee to consider extending the probationary period covering new federal employees.
Which is worse for a Federal agency to have, a bad employee or a bad supervisor? No doubt, the government would rather have neither, but the author says the effects of inept, biased, or malevolent leaders are among the greatest risks to your agency’s mission.